Example of Physics in Perspective format
Recent searches

Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format Example of Physics in Perspective format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Physics in Perspective — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
History #364 of 1328 down down by 159 ranks
Physics and Astronomy (all) #205 of 233 down down by 54 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 39 Published Papers | 21 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 22/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.25
SNIP: 1.893
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.6
SJR: 0.188
SNIP: 1.105
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.267
SNIP: 3.15
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.7
SJR: 0.171
SNIP: 2.17

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.6

60% from 2018

Impact factor for Physics in Perspective from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.6
2018 0.375
2017 0.625
2016 0.24
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.5

50% from 2019

CiteRatio for Physics in Perspective from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.5
2019 1.0
2018 1.0
2017 0.8
2016 0.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 60% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 50% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.103

35% from 2019

SJR for Physics in Perspective from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.103
2019 0.159
2018 0.147
2017 0.284
2016 0.17
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.286

61% from 2019

SNIP for Physics in Perspective from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.286
2019 0.732
2018 0.562
2017 1.168
2016 0.758
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 35% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 61% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Physics in Perspective

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Physics in Perspective

Physics in Perspective seeks to bridge the gulf between physicists and non-physicists through historical and philosophical studies that typically display the unpredictable as well as the cross-disciplinary interplay of observation, experiment, and theory that has occurred over...... Read More

History

General Physics and Astronomy

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
22 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1422-6944
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.641
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S000160200003
Reconsidering a scientific revolution: The case of Einstein versus Lorentz
Michel Janssen1
01 Dec 2002 - Physics in Perspective

Abstract:

The relationship between Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity and Hendrik A. Lorentz's ether theory is best understood in terms of competing interpretations of Lorentz invariance. In the 1890s, Lorentz proved and exploited the Lorentz invariance of Maxwell's equations, the laws governing electromagnetic fields in th... The relationship between Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity and Hendrik A. Lorentz's ether theory is best understood in terms of competing interpretations of Lorentz invariance. In the 1890s, Lorentz proved and exploited the Lorentz invariance of Maxwell's equations, the laws governing electromagnetic fields in the ether, with what he called the theorem of corresponding states. To account for the negative results of attempts to detect the earth's motion through the ether, Lorentz, in effect, had to assume that the laws governing the matter interacting with the fields are Lorentz invariant as well. This additional assumption can be seen as a generalization of the well-known contraction hypothesis. In Lorentz's theory, it remained an unexplained coincidence that both the laws governing fields and the laws governing matter should be Lorentz invariant. In special relativity, by contrast, the Lorentz invariance of all physical laws directly reflects the Minkowski space-time structure posited by the theory. One can use this observation to produce a common-cause argument to show that the relativistic interpretation of Lorentz invariance is preferable to Lorentz's interpretation. read more read less

Topics:

Lorentz covariance (74%)74% related to the paper, Test theories of special relativity (73%)73% related to the paper, Lorentz factor (72%)72% related to the paper, Velocity-addition formula (71%)71% related to the paper, Four-momentum (69%)69% related to the paper
85 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S000160200002
C. V. Raman and the Discovery of the Raman Effect
Rajinder Singh1
01 Dec 2002 - Physics in Perspective

Abstract:

In 1928 the Indian physicist C V Raman (1888-1970) discovered the effect named after him virtually simultaneously with the Russian physicists G S Landsberg (1890-1957) and L I Mandelstam (1879-1944) I first provide a biographical sketch of Raman through his years in Calcutta (1907-1932) and Bangalore (after 1932) I then discu... In 1928 the Indian physicist C V Raman (1888-1970) discovered the effect named after him virtually simultaneously with the Russian physicists G S Landsberg (1890-1957) and L I Mandelstam (1879-1944) I first provide a biographical sketch of Raman through his years in Calcutta (1907-1932) and Bangalore (after 1932) I then discuss his scientific work in acoustics, astronomy, and optics up to 1928, including his views on Albert Einstein's light-quantum hypothesis and on Arthur Holly Compton's discovery of the Compton effect, with particular reference to Compton's debate on it with William Duane in Toronto in 1924, which Raman witnessed I then examine Raman's discovery of the Raman effect and its reception among physicists Finally, I suggest reasons why Landsberg and Mandelstam did not share the Nobel Prize in Physics for 1930 with Raman read more read less

Topics:

Raman scattering (55%)55% related to the paper
65 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00016-002-8363-7
Planck, the Quantum, and the Historians
Clayton A. Gearhart1
01 May 2002 - Physics in Perspective

Abstract:

In late 1900, the German theoretical physicist Max Planck derived an expression for the spectrum of black-body radiation. That derivation was the first step in the introduction of quantum concepts into physics. But how did Planck think about his result in the early years of the twentieth century? Did he assume that his deriva... In late 1900, the German theoretical physicist Max Planck derived an expression for the spectrum of black-body radiation. That derivation was the first step in the introduction of quantum concepts into physics. But how did Planck think about his result in the early years of the twentieth century? Did he assume that his derivation was consistent with the continuous energies inherent in Maxwellian electrodynamics and Newtonian mechanics? Or did he see the beginnings, however tentative and uncertain, of the quantum revolution to come? Historians of physics have debated this question for over twenty years. In this article, I review that debate and, at the same time, present Planck's achievement in its historical context. read more read less

Topics:

Planck (54%)54% related to the paper, Planck's law (51%)51% related to the paper, Quantum (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
60 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00016-013-0117-1
The theory of the rise of sap in trees: some historical and conceptual remarks
Harvey R. Brown1
03 Sep 2013 - Physics in Perspective

Abstract:

The ability of trees to suck water from roots to leaves, sometimes to heights of over a hundred meters, is remarkable given the absence of any mechanical pump. In this study I deal with a number of issues, of both a historical and conceptual nature, in the orthodox Cohesion-Tension (CT) theory of the ascent of sap in trees. T... The ability of trees to suck water from roots to leaves, sometimes to heights of over a hundred meters, is remarkable given the absence of any mechanical pump. In this study I deal with a number of issues, of both a historical and conceptual nature, in the orthodox Cohesion-Tension (CT) theory of the ascent of sap in trees. The theory relies chiefly on the exceptional cohesive and adhesive properties of water, the structural properties of trees, and the role of evaporation (“transpiration”) from leaves. But it is not the whole story. Plant scientists have been aware since the inception of the theory in the late 19th century that further processes are at work in order to “prime” the trees, the main such process – growth itself – being so obvious to them that it is often omitted from the story. Other factors depend largely on the type of tree, and are not always fully understood. For physicists, in particular, it may be helpful to see the fuller picture, which is what I attempt to provide in nontechnical terms. read more read less
58 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00016-002-8357-5
The Origins of the Field Concept in Physics
Ernan McMullin1
01 Feb 2002 - Physics in Perspective

Abstract:

The term, “field,” made its first appearance in physics as a technical term in the mid-nineteenth century. But the notion of what later came to be called a field had been a long time in gestation. Early discussions of magnetism and of the cause of the ocean tides had long ago suggested the idea of a “zone of influence” surrou... The term, “field,” made its first appearance in physics as a technical term in the mid-nineteenth century. But the notion of what later came to be called a field had been a long time in gestation. Early discussions of magnetism and of the cause of the ocean tides had long ago suggested the idea of a “zone of influence” surrounding certain bodies. Johannes Kepler's mathematical rendering of the orbital motion of Mars encouraged him to formulate what he called “a true theory of gravity” involving the notion of attraction. Isaac Newton went on to construct an eminently effective dynamics, with attraction as its primary example of force. Was his a field theory? Historians of science disagree. Much depends on whether a theory consistent with the notion of action at a distance ought qualify as a “field” theory. Roger Boscovich and Immanuel Kant later took the Newtonian concept of attraction in new directions. It was left to Michael Faraday to propose the “physical existence” of lines of force and to James Clerk Maxwell to add as criterion the presence of energy as the ontological basis for a full-blown “field theory” of electromagnetic phenomena. read more read less

Topics:

Action at a distance (54%)54% related to the paper, Field (physics) (53%)53% related to the paper
56 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Physics in Perspective.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Physics in Perspective format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Physics in Perspective in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Physics in Perspective guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Physics in Perspective guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Physics in Perspective guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Physics in Perspective?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Physics in Perspective citation style.

4. Can I use the Physics in Perspective templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Physics in Perspective.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Physics in Perspective that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Physics in Perspective that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Physics in Perspective?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Physics in Perspective.

7. Where can I find the template for the Physics in Perspective?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Physics in Perspective's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Physics in Perspective's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Physics in Perspective an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Physics in Perspective is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Physics in Perspective?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Physics in Perspective?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Physics in Perspective?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Physics in Perspective, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Physics in Perspective's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Physics in Perspective?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Physics in Perspective. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Physics in Perspective?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Physics in Perspective are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Physics in Perspective?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Physics in Perspective's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Physics in Perspective in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Physics in Perspective Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Physics in Perspective formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template