Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format
Recent searches

Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format Example of Plant Systematics and Evolution format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Plant Systematics and Evolution — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Plant Science #140 of 445 down down by 35 ranks
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #233 of 647 down down by 30 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 355 Published Papers | 1054 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 14/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.875
SNIP: 0.949
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.1
SJR: 1.095
SNIP: 1.178
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.848
SNIP: 1.375

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.328

16% from 2018

Impact factor for Plant Systematics and Evolution from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.328
2018 1.585
2017 1.452
2016 1.239
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.0

3% from 2019

CiteRatio for Plant Systematics and Evolution from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.0
2019 2.9
2018 3.4
2017 3.1
2016 2.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 16% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.642

17% from 2019

SJR for Plant Systematics and Evolution from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.642
2019 0.547
2018 0.734
2017 0.64
2016 0.613
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.964

23% from 2019

SNIP for Plant Systematics and Evolution from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.964
2019 0.785
2018 1.068
2017 1.117
2016 0.984
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 23% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Plant Systematics and Evolution

The journal is devoted to publishing original papers and reviews on plant systematics in the broadest sense, encompassing evolutionary, phylogenetic and biogeographical studies at the populational, specific and higher taxonomic levels. Taxonomic emphasis is on green plants. Fi...... Read More

Plant Science

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
14 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0378-2697
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.042
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00606-007-0539-9
Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae

Abstract:

Phylogenetic relationships among 88 genera of Rosaceae were investigated using nucleotide sequence data from six nuclear (18S, gbssi1, gbssi2, ITS, pgip, and ppo) and four chloroplast (matK, ndhF, rbcL, and trnL-trnF) regions, separately and in various combinations, with parsimony and likelihood-based Bayesian approaches. The... Phylogenetic relationships among 88 genera of Rosaceae were investigated using nucleotide sequence data from six nuclear (18S, gbssi1, gbssi2, ITS, pgip, and ppo) and four chloroplast (matK, ndhF, rbcL, and trnL-trnF) regions, separately and in various combinations, with parsimony and likelihood-based Bayesian approaches. The results were used to examine evolution of non-molecular characters and to develop a new phylogenetically based infrafamilial classification. As in previous molecular phylogenetic analyses of the family, we found strong support for monophyly of groups corresponding closely to many previously recognized tribes and subfamilies, but no previous classification was entirely supported, and relationships among the strongly supported clades were weakly resolved and/or conflicted between some data sets. We recognize three subfamilies in Rosaceae: Rosoideae, including Filipendula, Rubus, Rosa, and three tribes; Dryadoideae, comprising the four actinorhizal genera; and Spiraeoideae, comprising Lyonothamnus and seven tribes. All genera previously assigned to Amygdaloideae and Maloideae are included in Spiraeoideae. Three supertribes, one in Rosoideae and two in Spiraeoideae, are recognized. read more read less

Topics:

Amygdaloideae (68%)68% related to the paper, Spiraeoideae (65%)65% related to the paper, Maloideae (60%)60% related to the paper, Rosoideae (57%)57% related to the paper, NdhF (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
700 Citations
Book Chapter DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6306-1_10
Pollen nutritional content and digestibility for animals
T'ai H. Roulston1, James H. Cane2

Abstract:

This paper reviews the literature concerning digestion and nutrient content of pollen. Four topics are addressed in detail: 1) The mechanism of pollen digestion by animals; 2) The efficiency of mechanical and digestive removal of pollen content by various animals; 3) Range and taxonomic distribution of pollen nutrients, and 4... This paper reviews the literature concerning digestion and nutrient content of pollen. Four topics are addressed in detail: 1) The mechanism of pollen digestion by animals; 2) The efficiency of mechanical and digestive removal of pollen content by various animals; 3) Range and taxonomic distribution of pollen nutrients, and 4) Adaptive hypotheses proposed to associate pollen chemistry with pollinator reward. Studies on the mechanism(s) of pollen digestion remain inconclusive, but suggest that differences in digestibility among pollen types may reflect differences in pollen wall porosity, thickness, and composition. Although hummingbirds reportedly digest pollen very poorly, most animals studied, including those that do not regularly consume pollen, can digest 50–100% of ingested grains. Overlooked and recent research of pollen protein content shows that pollen grains may contain over 60% protein, double the amount cited in some studies of pollen-feeding animals. Adaptive hypotheses that associate pollen starch and pollen caloric content with pollinator reward remain unsubstantiated when critically viewed through the lens of phylogeny. read more read less

Topics:

Pollen wall (80%)80% related to the paper, Pollen (66%)66% related to the paper, Pollinator (57%)57% related to the paper, Pollination syndrome (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
590 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00606-006-0415-Z
Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview
Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz1, Mark A. Beilstein2, Elizabeth A. Kellogg2

Abstract:

A critical review of characters used in the systematics of the Brassicaceae is given, and aspects of the origin, classification, and generic delimitation of the family discussed. Molecular phylogenetic studies of the family were reviewed, and major clades identified. Based on molecular studies, especially from the ndhF chloro... A critical review of characters used in the systematics of the Brassicaceae is given, and aspects of the origin, classification, and generic delimitation of the family discussed. Molecular phylogenetic studies of the family were reviewed, and major clades identified. Based on molecular studies, especially from the ndhF chloroplast gene, and careful evaluation of morphology and generic circumscriptions, a new tribal alignment of the Brassicaceae is proposed. In all, 25 tribes are recognized, of which seven (Aethionemeae, Boechereae, Descurainieae, Eutremeae, Halimolobeae, Noccaeeae, and Smelowskieae) are described as new. For each tribe, the center(s) of distribution, morphology, and number of taxa are given. Of the 338 genera currently recognized in the Brassicaceae, about 260 genera (or about 77%) were either assigned or tentatively assigned to the 25 tribes. Some problems relating to various genera and tribes are discussed, and future research developments are briefly covered. read more read less

Topics:

Systematics (53%)53% related to the paper, NdhF (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
586 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00987959
Chloroplastrps16 intron phylogeny of the tribeSileneae (Caryophyllaceae)
Bengt Oxelman, Magnus Lidén, Daniel Berglund

Abstract:

Intron sequences of the chloroplast generps16 from 46 species were used to examine phylogenetic relationships indicated by nrDNA ITS sequence variation in the tribeSileneae (Caryophyllaceae, Caryophylloideae). This region has previously not been utilized for phylogenetic purposes but the results presented here suggest that it... Intron sequences of the chloroplast generps16 from 46 species were used to examine phylogenetic relationships indicated by nrDNA ITS sequence variation in the tribeSileneae (Caryophyllaceae, Caryophylloideae). This region has previously not been utilized for phylogenetic purposes but the results presented here suggest that it is a consistent and valuable complement to the ITS sequences. Therps16 intron trees are largely congruent with the ITS trees. All the major hypotheses suggested by the ITS data are supported, often at similar bootstrap levels. The joint usage ofrps16 intron and ITS sequences provides a powerful tool for resolving many of the difficult taxonomic issues in the tribeSileneae. read more read less

Topics:

Phylogenetic tree (52%)52% related to the paper, Phylogenetics (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
579 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00987957
Chloroplast DNA intraspecific phylogeography of plants from the Pacific Northwest of North America
Douglas E. Soltis1, Matthew A. Gitzendanner1, Darren D. Strenge1, Pamela S. Soltis1

Abstract:

Molecular studies of plants from the Pacific Northwest of North America suggest a recurrent pattern of genetic differentiation and geographic structuring. In each of five angiosperms and one fern species representing diverse life histories, cpDNA data indicate two clades of populations that are geographically structured. A no... Molecular studies of plants from the Pacific Northwest of North America suggest a recurrent pattern of genetic differentiation and geographic structuring. In each of five angiosperms and one fern species representing diverse life histories, cpDNA data indicate two clades of populations that are geographically structured. A northern group comprises populations from Alaska to central or southern Oregon, whereas populations from central Oregon southward to northern California form a southern group. In several of these species, a few populations having southern genotypes may have survived in glacial refugia further north in the Olympic Peninsula, Queen Charlotte Islands, and Prince of Wales Island. Allozyme data reveal a similar pattern of differentiation in several other plants from the Pacific Northwest. North-south partitioning of genotypes has also been reported for several animal species from this region. On a broader geographic scale, northsouth partitioning of genotypes has also been observed in other plants from western North America having a variety of geographic distributions. Some species also display a reduction of genetic variability in the northern portion of their range compared to the south. The data suggest strongly that past glaciation profoundly influenced the genetic architecture of the flora and fauna of the Pacific Northwest. Two alternative hypotheses are advanced to explain the geographic structuring of genotypes. First, past glaciation may have created discontinuities in the geographic distributions of plant species, with populations surviving in several well-isolated northern and southern refugia. Following glaciation, migration of genetically differentiated, once-isolated populations resulted in the formation of a continuous geographic distribution with a major genetic discontinuity. Alternatively, plants survived and subsequently migrated northward from a southern refugium, and a genotype became fixed in one or a few populations at the leading edge of recolonization. Subsequent long-distance dispersal from this leading edge resulted in a relatively uniform northern genotype that differs from the southern genotype(s). Whatever the underlying mechanism, Pleistocence glaciation may have molded the intraspecific genetic architecture of both plants and animals from the Pacific Northwest in a geographically similar manner. Future studies should seek to obtain a comprehensive phylogeography for regions that includes a diversity of both plants and animals. read more read less

Topics:

Refugium (population biology) (54%)54% related to the paper, Biogeography (54%)54% related to the paper, Phylogeography (52%)52% related to the paper, Biological dispersal (52%)52% related to the paper, Range (biology) (51%)51% related to the paper
531 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Plant Systematics and Evolution.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Plant Systematics and Evolution format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Plant Systematics and Evolution in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Plant Systematics and Evolution guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Plant Systematics and Evolution guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Plant Systematics and Evolution guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Plant Systematics and Evolution?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Plant Systematics and Evolution citation style.

4. Can I use the Plant Systematics and Evolution templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Plant Systematics and Evolution.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Plant Systematics and Evolution that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Plant Systematics and Evolution that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Plant Systematics and Evolution?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Plant Systematics and Evolution.

7. Where can I find the template for the Plant Systematics and Evolution?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Plant Systematics and Evolution's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Plant Systematics and Evolution's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Plant Systematics and Evolution an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Plant Systematics and Evolution is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Plant Systematics and Evolution?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Plant Systematics and Evolution?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Plant Systematics and Evolution?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Plant Systematics and Evolution, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Plant Systematics and Evolution's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Plant Systematics and Evolution?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Plant Systematics and Evolution. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Plant Systematics and Evolution?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Plant Systematics and Evolution are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Plant Systematics and Evolution?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Plant Systematics and Evolution's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Plant Systematics and Evolution in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Plant Systematics and Evolution Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Plant Systematics and Evolution formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template