Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format
Recent searches

Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format Example of Techniques in Coloproctology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Techniques in Coloproctology — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Surgery #89 of 422 down down by 12 ranks
Gastroenterology #63 of 136 down down by 5 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 517 Published Papers | 1907 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 26/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.811
SNIP: 1.877
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.2
SJR: 1.667
SNIP: 1.516
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.5
SJR: 1.72
SNIP: 1.405
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.4
SJR: 0.774
SNIP: 1.283

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.721

3% from 2018

Impact factor for Techniques in Coloproctology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.721
2018 2.635
2017 2.378
2016 2.342
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.7

12% from 2019

CiteRatio for Techniques in Coloproctology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.7
2019 3.3
2018 3.1
2017 3.7
2016 3.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 3% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.816

4% from 2019

SJR for Techniques in Coloproctology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.816
2019 0.854
2018 0.817
2017 0.698
2016 0.998
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.247

14% from 2019

SNIP for Techniques in Coloproctology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.247
2019 1.091
2018 0.841
2017 0.967
2016 1.102
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Techniques in Coloproctology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Techniques in Coloproctology

Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics cover...... Read More

Surgery

Gastroenterology

Medicine

i
Last updated on
26 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1123-6337
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.925
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S101510070012
Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial

Abstract:

Summary Background Surgical haemorrhoidectomy has a reputation for being a painful procedure for a fairly benign disorder. The circular transanal stapled technique for the treatment of haemorrhoids has the potential to offer a less painful rectal procedure in place of ablative perianal surgery. We compared the short-term outc... Summary Background Surgical haemorrhoidectomy has a reputation for being a painful procedure for a fairly benign disorder. The circular transanal stapled technique for the treatment of haemorrhoids has the potential to offer a less painful rectal procedure in place of ablative perianal surgery. We compared the short-term outcome of the circular stapled procedure for haemorrhoids with current standard surgery in a randomised controlled trial. Methods 40 patients admitted for surgical treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids were randomly assigned to MilliganMorgan haemorrhoidectomy (n=20) or the circular stapled procedure. Under general anaesthesia patients underwent standardised diathermy excision haemorrhoidectomy or had a circumferential doughnut of rectal mucosa and submucosa above the dentate line excised and closed with a standard circular end-to-end stapling device. All patients received standardised preoperative and postoperative analgesic and laxative regimens. Patients completed linear analogue pain charts each day and were interviewed at 1, 3, and 6–10 weeks postoperatively. Summary measures of average pain experience were calculated from 10 cm linear analogue pain scores and were used as the primary outcome measure. Findings The stapled group had shorter anaesthesia time (median 18 [range 9–25] vs 22 [15–35] mins). Average pain in the stapled group was significantly lower than it was in the Milligan-Morgan group (2·1 [0·2–7·6] vs 6·5 [3·1–8·5], 95·1% CI difference medians 1·9–4·7, p0·0001. Mann-Whitney U test). Average pain relative to what the patient expected was also significantly less in the stapled group (–2·8 [4·4 to 1·3] vs 0·7 [1·8 to 3·4]. Hospital stay and time to first bowel motion were not significantly different between groups. Return to normal activity was significantly shorter in the stapled group (17 [3–60] vs 34 [14–90]. Early and late complications, patient-assessed symptom control, and functional outcome appear similar after short-term follow-up Interpretation The circular stapled technique offers a significantly less painful alternative to Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy and is associated with an earlier return to normal activity. Early symptom control and functional outcome appear similar. However, long-term symptomatic and functional outcome need further study. Lancet 2000; 355: 782–85 See Commentary page xxx read more read less
View PDF
274 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S101510300001
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options
S. Chintapatla, N. Safarani, S. Kumar, N. Haboubi

Abstract:

Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease is a common and well recognized entity. For many years the cause of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus has been matter of debate. When the treatment is considered, there was a frequent lack of succes of the surgical methods of excision regarding morbidity, healing, recurrence and cure. All these f... Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease is a common and well recognized entity. For many years the cause of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus has been matter of debate. When the treatment is considered, there was a frequent lack of succes of the surgical methods of excision regarding morbidity, healing, recurrence and cure. All these factors rendered the acquired thesis of pilonidal sinus disease to be more accepted. In dealing with the pathogenesis of pilonidal sinus disease, Karydakis attributed the hair insertion process to three main factors: the invader, i.e. the loose hair; the force, which causes the insertion; and the vulnerability of the skin to the insertion of hair at the depth of the natal cleft. The sinus is initiated from a small midline opening lined by stratified squamous epithelium. Additional sinuses are frequent and have lateral openings. Malignant transformation is rare but cases of squamous cell carcinoma and verrucous carcinoma have been reported. Pilonidal sinus disease consists in a symptoms complex with presentations ranging from asymptomatic pits to painful draining lesions that are predominantly located in the sacrococcygeal region. Asymptomatic pits do not require treatment. Options for treatment of acute abscess include aspiration, drainage without curettage, and drainage with curettage. The choice of a particular surgical approach depends on the surgeon's familiarity with the procedure and perceived result in terms of low recurrence of sinus and a quick healing of resulting cavity or surgical wound. Conservative nonoperative management, closed methods, laying of track, wide excision and open drainage, wide excision and primary closure, and limited excision are the methods currently used. From the profusion of studies, it is apparent that various methods are being tried and no one method is universally acceptable. Recurrence rates vary with the technique, operator and length of follow-up. Primary closure with a lateral approach appears to give the best results. read more read less

Topics:

Surgical wound (55%)55% related to the paper, Sinus (anatomy) (53%)53% related to the paper, Intergluteal cleft (52%)52% related to the paper
264 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10151-008-0391-0
Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Abstract:

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be l... Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented. read more read less

Topics:

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy (67%)67% related to the paper, Rectal prolapse (61%)61% related to the paper, Hemorrhoids (57%)57% related to the paper, Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (54%)54% related to the paper, Obstructed defecation (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
246 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10151-011-0769-2
Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas

Abstract:

Background Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is a novel minimally invasive and sphincter-saving technique for treating complex fistulas. The aim of this report is to describe the procedural steps and preliminary results of VAAFT. Background Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is a novel minimally invasive and sphincter-saving technique for treating complex fistulas. The aim of this report is to describe the procedural steps and preliminary results of VAAFT. read more read less

Topics:

Anal fistula (72%)72% related to the paper, Anal canal (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
244 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10151-017-1731-8
Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ruth Blanco-Colino1, E Espin-Basany1

Abstract:

Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been proven to be an effective tool to assess anastomotic perfusion. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate its efficacy in reducing the anastomotic leakage (AL) rate after colorectal surgery. PubMed, Scopus, WOS, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library... Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been proven to be an effective tool to assess anastomotic perfusion. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate its efficacy in reducing the anastomotic leakage (AL) rate after colorectal surgery. PubMed, Scopus, WOS, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2017 for studies comparing fluorescence imaging with standard care. ClinicalTrials.gov register was searched for ongoing trials. The primary outcome measure was AL rate with at least 1 month of follow-up. ROBINS-I tool was used for quality assessment. A meta-analysis with random-effects model was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) from the original data. One thousand three hundred and two patients from 5 non-randomized studies were included. Fluorescence imaging significantly reduced the AL rate in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (OR 0.34; CI 0.16–0.74; p = 0.006). Low AL rates were shown in rectal cancer surgery (ICG 1.1% vs non-ICG 6.1%; p = 0.02). There was no significant decrease in the AL rate when colorectal procedures for benign and malignant disease were combined. To date, there are no published randomized control trials (RCTs) on this subject, though 3 ongoing RCTs were identified. ICG fluorescence imaging seems to reduce AL rates following colorectal surgery for cancer. However, the inherent bias of the non-randomized studies included, and their differences in AL definition and diagnosis could have influenced results. Large well-designed RCTs are needed to provide evidence for its routine use in colorectal surgery. read more read less

Topics:

Colorectal surgery (52%)52% related to the paper, Indocyanine green (51%)51% related to the paper
231 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Techniques in Coloproctology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Techniques in Coloproctology format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Techniques in Coloproctology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Techniques in Coloproctology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Techniques in Coloproctology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Techniques in Coloproctology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Techniques in Coloproctology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Techniques in Coloproctology citation style.

4. Can I use the Techniques in Coloproctology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Techniques in Coloproctology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Techniques in Coloproctology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Techniques in Coloproctology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Techniques in Coloproctology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Techniques in Coloproctology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Techniques in Coloproctology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Techniques in Coloproctology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Techniques in Coloproctology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Techniques in Coloproctology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Techniques in Coloproctology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Techniques in Coloproctology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Techniques in Coloproctology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Techniques in Coloproctology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Techniques in Coloproctology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Techniques in Coloproctology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Techniques in Coloproctology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Techniques in Coloproctology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Techniques in Coloproctology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Techniques in Coloproctology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Techniques in Coloproctology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Techniques in Coloproctology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Techniques in Coloproctology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Techniques in Coloproctology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Techniques in Coloproctology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template