Example of Wetlands format
Recent searches

Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format Example of Wetlands format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Wetlands — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Ecology #155 of 400 down down by 47 ranks
Environmental Science (all) #85 of 220 down down by 28 ranks
Environmental Chemistry #81 of 122 down down by 23 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 550 Published Papers | 1510 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 09/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 15.5
SJR: 4.146
SNIP: 2.714
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.0
SJR: 1.564
SNIP: 1.937
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.5
SJR: 1.643
SNIP: 1.31
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.9
SJR: 0.441
SNIP: 0.995

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.783

4% from 2018

Impact factor for Wetlands from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.783
2018 1.854
2017 1.811
2016 1.573
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.7

25% from 2019

CiteRatio for Wetlands from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.7
2019 3.6
2018 3.1
2017 3.0
2016 2.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 4% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 25% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.703

8% from 2019

SJR for Wetlands from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.703
2019 0.763
2018 0.765
2017 0.755
2016 0.704
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.917

2% from 2019

SNIP for Wetlands from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.917
2019 0.902
2018 0.85
2017 0.824
2016 0.976
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Wetlands

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Wetlands

Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publi...... Read More

Environmental Science

i
Last updated on
08 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0277-5212
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.999
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[889:TCBONA]2.0.CO;2
The carbon balance of north american wetlands
Scott D. Bridgham1, J. Patrick Megonigal2, Jason K. Keller2, Norman B. Bliss3, Carl C. Trettin4
01 Dec 2006 - Wetlands

Abstract:

We examine the carbon balance of North American wetlands by reviewing and synthesizing the published literature and soil databases. North American wetlands contain about 220 Pg C, most of which is in peat. They are a small to moderate carbon sink of about 49 Tg C yr−1, although the uncertainty around this estimate is greater ... We examine the carbon balance of North American wetlands by reviewing and synthesizing the published literature and soil databases. North American wetlands contain about 220 Pg C, most of which is in peat. They are a small to moderate carbon sink of about 49 Tg C yr−1, although the uncertainty around this estimate is greater than 100%, with the largest unknown being the role of carbon sequestration by sedimentation in freshwater mineral-soil wetlands. We estimate that North American wetlands emit 9 Tg methane (CH4) yr−1; however, the uncertainty of this estimate is also greater than 100%. With the exception of estuarine wetlands, CH4 emissions from wetlands may largely offset any positive benefits of carbon sequestration in soils and plants in terms of climate forcing. Historically, the destruction of wetlands through land-use changes has had the largest effects on the carbon fluxes and consequent radiative forcing of North American wetlands. The primary effects have been a reduction in their ability to sequester carbon (a small to moderate increase in radiative forcing), oxidation of their soil carbon reserves upon drainage (a small increase in radiative forcing), and reduction in CH4 emissions (a small to large decrease in radiative forcing). It is uncertain how global changes will affect the carbon pools and fluxes of North American wetlands. We will not be able to predict accurately the role of wetlands as potential positive or negative feedbacks to anthropogenic global change without knowing the integrative effects of changes in temperature, precipitation, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, and atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur on the carbon balance of North American wetlands. read more read less

Topics:

Carbon sequestration (60%)60% related to the paper, Carbon sink (59%)59% related to the paper, Radiative forcing (57%)57% related to the paper, Wetland (56%)56% related to the paper, Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
840 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF03161678
Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment—An integrative model
John M. Mahoney, Stewart B. Rood1
01 Dec 1998 - Wetlands

Abstract:

This paper describes the ‘recruitment box,’ an integrative model that defines the stream stage patterns that enable successful establishment of riparian cottonwood seedlings. In western North America, cottonwood seed dispersal generally occurs after annual peak river flows. The receding stream exposes moist sites upon which s... This paper describes the ‘recruitment box,’ an integrative model that defines the stream stage patterns that enable successful establishment of riparian cottonwood seedlings. In western North America, cottonwood seed dispersal generally occurs after annual peak river flows. The receding stream exposes moist sites upon which seeds land after transport by wind and water. Germination is rapid, and initial seedling establishment is often prolific. However, the vast majority of seedlings die, primarily due to drought stress, as root growth is insufficient to maintain contact with the receding zone of moisture. Cottonwood roots grow about 0.5 to 1 cm per day or 60 to 100 cm in the first year. Along the ‘losing’ streams in semi-arid regions, the riparian water table is an almost horizontal extension from the stream stage. A capillary fringe exists above the water table and is often 30 to 40 cm in elevation, but can range from about 5 to 130 cm depending on substrate texture. The combination of root growth and capillary fringe define the successful recruitment band, which is usually from about 0.6 to 2 m in elevation above the late summer stream stage. Within this range, higher elevation establishment occurs (i) for theAigeiros cottonwoods,Populus deltoides, andP. fremontii, which grow more rapidly thanTacamahaca species and occur in warmer areas with longer growing seasons; (ii) along larger rivers that are characterized by more gradual stage fluctuations; and (iii) along streams with finer substrate. The rate of stream stage decline is also critical for seedling survival and should not exceed 2.5 cm per day. The recruitment box model is consistent with dendrochronological interpretations that moderate flood events are naturally required for cottonwood recruitment. Flood events with recurrences of about 1 in 5 to 1 in 10 years often satisfy the model and provide stream stage patterns with a gradual decline through the recruitment box. The model will facilitate analyses of the reproductive ecology of riparian cottonwoods and also permit the prescription of stream stage patterns for cottonwood seedling recruitment along dammed rivers. read more read less

Topics:

Populus fremontii (61%)61% related to the paper, Substrate (marine biology) (55%)55% related to the paper, Riparian zone (54%)54% related to the paper, Populus angustifolia (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
653 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF03161781
Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America.
Susan M. Galatowitsch1, Neil O. Anderson1, Peter D. Ascher1
01 Dec 1999 - Wetlands

Abstract:

The spread of invasive taxa, includingLythrum salicaria, Typha × glauca, Myriophyllum spicatum, Phalaris arundinacea, andPhragmites australis, has dramatically changed the vegetation of many wetlands of North America. Three theories have been advanced to explain the nature of plant invasiveness. Aggressive growth during geogr... The spread of invasive taxa, includingLythrum salicaria, Typha × glauca, Myriophyllum spicatum, Phalaris arundinacea, andPhragmites australis, has dramatically changed the vegetation of many wetlands of North America. Three theories have been advanced to explain the nature of plant invasiveness. Aggressive growth during geographic expansion could result because 1) growth is more favorable under new environmental conditions than those of resident locales (environmental constraints hypothesis); 2) herbivores may be absent in the new locale, resulting in selection of genotypes with improved competitive ability and reduced allocation to herbivore defenses (evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis); and 3) interspecific hybridization occurred between a new taxon and one existing in an area, resulting in novel phenotypes with selective advantages in disturbed sites or phenotypes that can grow under conditions not favorable for either parent (introgression/hybrid speciation hypothesis). A review of published literature found few studies that compare the growth and dynamics of invasive populations in their new range versus those in historic ranges. However, there is evidence that hydrologic alterations could facilitate invasions byTypha × glauca andPhalaris arundinacea and that increased salinity promoted spread ofTypha angustifolia (parental taxon) andPhlaris arundinacea and that increased salinity promoted spread ofTypha angustifolia (parental taxon) andPhragmites australis. The potential for reduced herbivory causing aggressive growth is greatest forLythrum salicaria. Introgressive hybridization is potentially a cause of invasiveness for all five species but has been established only forTypha × glauca andLythrum salicaria. read more read less

Topics:

Lythrum salicaria (52%)52% related to the paper, Phalaris arundinacea (52%)52% related to the paper, Introgression (51%)51% related to the paper
498 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S13157-009-0003-4
Carbon Storage and Fluxes within Freshwater Wetlands: a Critical Review
Birol Kayranli1, Miklas Scholz1, Atif Mustafa1, Åsa Hedmark2
01 Jan 2010 - Wetlands

Abstract:

We critically review recent literature on carbon storage and fluxes within natural and constructed freshwater wetlands, and specifically address concerns of readers working in applied science and engineering. Our purpose is to review and assess the distribution and conversion of carbon in the water environment, particularly w... We critically review recent literature on carbon storage and fluxes within natural and constructed freshwater wetlands, and specifically address concerns of readers working in applied science and engineering. Our purpose is to review and assess the distribution and conversion of carbon in the water environment, particularly within wetland systems. A key aim is to assess if wetlands are carbon sinks or sources. Carbon sequestration and fluxes in natural and constructed wetlands located around the world has been assessed. All facets of carbon (solid and gaseous forms) have been covered. We draw conclusions based on these studies. Findings indicate that wetlands can be both sources and sinks of carbon, depending on their age, operation, and the environmental boundary conditions such as location and climate. Suggestions for further research needs in the area of carbon storage in wetland sediments are outlined to facilitate the understanding of the processes of carbon storage and removal and also the factors that influence them. read more read less

Topics:

Carbon sequestration (63%)63% related to the paper, Carbon sink (57%)57% related to the paper, Wetland (56%)56% related to the paper, Greenhouse gas (54%)54% related to the paper, Water environment (53%)53% related to the paper
495 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S13157-011-0190-7
A Classification of Major Naturally-Occurring Amazonian Lowland Wetlands
08 Jul 2011 - Wetlands

Abstract:

Our estimates indicate that about 30% of the seven million square kilometers that make up the Amazon basin comply with international criteria for wetland definition. Most countries sharing the Amazon basin have signed the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance but still lack complete wetland inventories, cl... Our estimates indicate that about 30% of the seven million square kilometers that make up the Amazon basin comply with international criteria for wetland definition. Most countries sharing the Amazon basin have signed the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance but still lack complete wetland inventories, classification systems, and management plans. Amazonian wetlands vary considerably with respect to hydrology, water and soil fertility, vegetation cover, diversity of plant and animal species, and primary and secondary productivity. They also play important roles in the hydrology and biogeochemical cycles of the basin. Here, we propose a classification system for large Amazonian wetland types based on climatic, hydrological, hydrochemical, and botanical parameters. The classification scheme divides natural wetlands into one group with rather stable water levels and another with oscillating water levels. These groups are subdivided into 14 major wetland types. The types are characterized and their distributions and extents are mapped. read more read less

Topics:

Wetland (60%)60% related to the paper, Ramsar Convention (57%)57% related to the paper, Amazonian (52%)52% related to the paper
461 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Wetlands.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Wetlands format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Wetlands in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Wetlands guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Wetlands guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Wetlands guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Wetlands?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Wetlands citation style.

4. Can I use the Wetlands templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Wetlands.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Wetlands that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Wetlands that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Wetlands?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Wetlands.

7. Where can I find the template for the Wetlands?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Wetlands's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Wetlands's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Wetlands an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Wetlands is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Wetlands?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Wetlands?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Wetlands?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Wetlands, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Wetlands's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Wetlands?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Wetlands. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Wetlands?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Wetlands are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Wetlands?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Wetlands's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Wetlands in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Wetlands Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Wetlands formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template