Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format
Recent searches

Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format Example of Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
History #24 of 1328 down down by 7 ranks
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) #25 of 85 down down by 7 ranks
Environmental Science (all) #79 of 220 down down by 14 ranks
Environmental Chemistry #77 of 122 down down by 12 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 176 Published Papers | 506 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 01/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.4
SJR: 1.316
SNIP: 1.578
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 15.5
SJR: 4.146
SNIP: 2.714
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.2
SJR: 2.512
SNIP: 1.49
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 2.7
SJR: 0.703
SNIP: 0.917

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.464

5% from 2018

Impact factor for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.464
2018 1.398
2017 1.24
2016 1.162
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.9

4% from 2019

CiteRatio for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.9
2019 2.8
2018 2.5
2017 2.7
2016 2.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 5% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.441

13% from 2019

SJR for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.441
2019 0.509
2018 0.451
2017 0.748
2016 0.603
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.995

7% from 2019

SNIP for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.995
2019 0.93
2018 0.817
2017 1.082
2016 0.858
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 239 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
01 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1573-322X
i
Open Access
Hybrid
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10806-005-5485-3
Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap
Iris Vermeir1, Wim Verbeke2

Abstract:

Although public interest in sustainability increases and consumer attitudes are mainly positive, behavioral patterns are not univocally consistent with attitudes. This study investigates the presumed gap between favorable attitude towards sustainable behavior and behavioral intention to purchase sustainable food products. The... Although public interest in sustainability increases and consumer attitudes are mainly positive, behavioral patterns are not univocally consistent with attitudes. This study investigates the presumed gap between favorable attitude towards sustainable behavior and behavioral intention to purchase sustainable food products. The impact of involvement, perceived availability, certainty, perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE), values, and social norms on consumers’ attitudes and intentions towards sustainable food products is analyzed. The empirical research builds on a survey with a sample of 456 young consumers, using a questionnaire and an experimental design with manipulation of key constructs through showing advertisements for sustainable dairy. Involvement with sustainability, certainty, and PCE have a significant positive impact on attitude towards buying sustainable dairy products, which in turn correlates strongly with intention to buy. Low perceived availability of sustainable products explains why intentions to buy remain low, although attitudes might be positive. On the reverse side, experiencing social pressure from peers (social norm) explains intentions to buy, despite rather negative personal attitudes. This study shows that more sustainable and ethical food consumption can be stimulated through raising involvement, PCE, certainty, social norms, and perceived availability. read more read less

Topics:

Sustainable consumption (65%)65% related to the paper, Sustainable products (54%)54% related to the paper, Sustainability (53%)53% related to the paper
1,906 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF02286399
Amounts of pesticides reaching target pests: Environmental impacts and ethics
David Pimentel1

Abstract:

Less than 0.1% of pesticides applied for pest control reach their target pests. Thus, more than 99.9% of pesticides used move into the environment where they adversely affect public health and beneficial biota, and contaminate soil, water, and the atmosphere of the ecosystem. Improved pesticide application technologies can im... Less than 0.1% of pesticides applied for pest control reach their target pests. Thus, more than 99.9% of pesticides used move into the environment where they adversely affect public health and beneficial biota, and contaminate soil, water, and the atmosphere of the ecosystem. Improved pesticide application technologies can improve pesticide use efficiency and protect public health and the environment. read more read less

Topics:

Pesticide application (62%)62% related to the paper, Pesticide (52%)52% related to the paper
667 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1015012403331
Dealing with Ambivalence: Farmers' and Consumers' Perceptions of Animal Welfare in Livestock Breeding
H.M. te Velde1, Noelle Aarts1, C.M.J. van Woerkum1

Abstract:

The results of an empirical study intoperceptions of the treatment of farm animals inthe Netherlands are presented. A qualitativeapproach, based on in-depth interviews withmeat livestock farmers and consumers was chosenin order to assess motivations behindperceptions and to gain insight into the waypeople deal with possible d... The results of an empirical study intoperceptions of the treatment of farm animals inthe Netherlands are presented. A qualitativeapproach, based on in-depth interviews withmeat livestock farmers and consumers was chosenin order to assess motivations behindperceptions and to gain insight into the waypeople deal with possible discrepancies betweentheir perceptions and their daily practices.Perceptions are analyzed with the help of aframe of reference, which consists ofvalues, norms, convictions, interests, andknowledge. The perceptions of the interviewed farmersare quite consistent and without exceptionpositive: according to them, nothing is wrongwith animal welfare in livestock breeding. Theperceptions of the consumers we interviewed aremore divergent, but generally negative. Bothgroups show ambivalence as a result ofdiscrepancies between perceptions and behavior.Although the consumers share the impressionthat the living conditions of livestock animalsare far from optimal, most of them still buyand eat meat from the meat industry. Thefarmers believe the welfare of their animals isgood, but, as frequent defensive utterancesshow, they feel uncomfortable with expressed orunexpressed accusations of mistreating animals.The ways the respondents deal with thisambivalence were analysed by drawing ontheories of dissonance reduction and distancing devices. Catherine and Raphael Larrere(Larrere and Larrere, 2000) argue thatanimal rearing is a hierarchical relationshipwhose rules are to be found in the fiction of adomestic contract. We argue that the questionis not whether there should be a domesticcontract, because such a contract seems alreadyaccepted. However, since values and normsdiffer widely, not only among meat livestockfarmers and consumers, but also amongconsumers, the question remains as to whosevalues and norms should form the basis of thedomestic contract. read more read less

Topics:

Animal welfare (52%)52% related to the paper, Meat packing industry (52%)52% related to the paper
401 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1009538613588
Ethical challenges for livestock production: meeting consumer concerns about meat safety and animal welfare
Wim Verbeke1, Jacques Viaene1

Abstract:

Livestock production today faces thedifficult task of effectively meeting emergingconsumer concerns while remaining competitive on majortarget markets. Meeting consumer concerns aboutproduct safety and animal welfare are identified askey attention points for future livestock production.The relevance of these issues pertains t... Livestock production today faces thedifficult task of effectively meeting emergingconsumer concerns while remaining competitive on majortarget markets. Meeting consumer concerns aboutproduct safety and animal welfare are identified askey attention points for future livestock production.The relevance of these issues pertains to productionefficiency and economic benefits and tore-establishing meat sector image and consumer trust.The current paper analyses consumer concerns about theethical issues of meat safety and animal welfare fromcurrent livestock production. The research methodologyis based on literature review, secondary data sources,and primary research through focus group discussionsand a survey of 320 meat consumers in Belgium.Objectives were to assess importance attached byconsumers to product safety and animal welfare asethical issues in commercial livestock production, andto evaluate consumer perception of these issues forbeef, pork, and poultry. Significant differences inissue importance and perception are identified amongconsumer groups based on socio-demographic andbehavioral characteristics. From the analysis, meatsafety emerges as an absolute but minimum requirementfor future success of livestock and meat production.Additionally, animal welfare can be expected to becomea critical theme especially for pork and poultryacceptance. read more read less

Topics:

Animal welfare (56%)56% related to the paper, Livestock (52%)52% related to the paper, Consumer behaviour (51%)51% related to the paper
256 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10806-011-9345-Z
Reducing meat consumption in today’s consumer society: questioning the citizen-consumer gap
Erik de Bakker1, Hans Dagevos1

Abstract:

Our growing demand for meat and dairy food products is unsustainable. It is hard to imagine that this global issue can be solved solely by more efficient technologies. Lowering our meat consumption seems inescapable. Yet, the question is whether modern consumers can be considered as reliable allies to achieve this shift in me... Our growing demand for meat and dairy food products is unsustainable. It is hard to imagine that this global issue can be solved solely by more efficient technologies. Lowering our meat consumption seems inescapable. Yet, the question is whether modern consumers can be considered as reliable allies to achieve this shift in meat consumption pattern. Is there not a yawning gap between our responsible intentions as citizens and our hedonic desires as consumers? We will argue that consumers can and should be considered as partners that must be involved in realizing new ways of protein consumption that contribute to a more sustainable world. In particular the large food consumer group of flexitarians offer promising opportunities for transforming our meat consumption patterns. We propose a pragmatic approach that explicitly goes beyond the standard suggestion of persuasion strategies and suggests different routes of change, coined sustainability by stealth, moderate involvement, and cultural change respectively. The recognition of more routes of change to a more plant-based diet implies that the ethical debate on meat should not only associate consumer change with rational persuasion strategies and food citizens that instantiate “strong” sustainable consumption. Such a focus narrows the debate on sustainable protein consumption and easily results in disappointment about consumers’ participation. A more wide-ranging concept of ethical consumption can leave the negative verdict behind that consumers are mainly an obstacle for sustainability and lead to a more optimistic view on modern consumers as allies and agents of change. read more read less

Topics:

Sustainable consumption (62%)62% related to the paper, Consumption (economics) (55%)55% related to the paper, Sustainability (52%)52% related to the paper, Persuasion (50%)50% related to the paper, Global issue (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
225 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics citation style.

4. Can I use the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.

7. Where can I find the template for the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template