Example of Colorectal Disease format
Recent searches

Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format Example of Colorectal Disease format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Colorectal Disease — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Gastroenterology #52 of 136 down down by 13 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 752 Published Papers | 3235 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 04/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.2
SJR: 1.667
SNIP: 1.516
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.1
SJR: 1.203
SNIP: 1.387
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.0
SJR: 1.026
SNIP: 1.34
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 12.0
SJR: 2.33
SNIP: 2.277

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.769

8% from 2018

Impact factor for Colorectal Disease from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.769
2018 2.997
2017 2.778
2016 2.689
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.3

9% from 2019

CiteRatio for Colorectal Disease from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.3
2019 4.7
2018 5.0
2017 4.8
2016 5.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 8% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.029

6% from 2019

SJR for Colorectal Disease from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.029
2019 1.095
2018 1.208
2017 1.229
2016 1.214
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.345

6% from 2019

SNIP for Colorectal Disease from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.345
2019 1.27
2018 1.232
2017 1.186
2016 1.17
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Colorectal Disease

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Colorectal Disease

Diseases of the lower gastrointestinal tract are common, and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of th...... Read More

Gastroenterology

Medicine

i
Last updated on
04 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1462-8910
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.05
i
Frequency
12 issues/year
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1463-1318.2008.01735.X
Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome.
Werner Hohenberger1, Klaus Weber1, Klaus E. Matzel1, Thomas Papadopoulos, Susanne Merkel1
01 May 2009 - Colorectal Disease

Abstract:

Objective Total mesorectal excision (TME) as proposed by R.J. Heald more than 20 years ago, is nowadays accepted worldwide for optimal rectal cancer surgery. This technique is focused on an intact package of the tumour and its main lymphatic drainage. This concept can be translated into colon cancer surgery, as the mesorec... Objective Total mesorectal excision (TME) as proposed by R.J. Heald more than 20 years ago, is nowadays accepted worldwide for optimal rectal cancer surgery. This technique is focused on an intact package of the tumour and its main lymphatic drainage. This concept can be translated into colon cancer surgery, as the mesorectum is only part of the mesenteric planes which cover the colon and its lymphatic drainage like envelopes. According to the concept of TME for rectal cancer, we perform a concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colonic cancer. This technique aims at the separation of the mesocolic from the parietal plane and true central ligation of the supplying arteries and draining veins right at their roots. Method  Prospectively obtained data from 1329 consecutive patients of our department with RO-resection of colon cancer between 1978 and 2002 were analysed. Patient data of three subdivided time periods were compared. Results  By consequent application of the procedure of CME, we were able to reduce local 5-year recurrence rates in colon cancer from 6.5% in the period from 1978 to 1984 to 3.6% in 1995 to 2002. In the same period, the cancer related 5-year survival rates in patients resected for cure increased from 82.1% to 89.1%. Conclusion  The technique of CME in colon cancer surgery aims at a specimen with intact layers and a maximum of lymphnode harvest. This is translated into lower local recurrence rates and better overall survival. read more read less

Topics:

Total mesorectal excision (59%)59% related to the paper, Cancer (53%)53% related to the paper, Colorectal cancer (52%)52% related to the paper, Middle colic artery (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
1,242 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1463-1318.2004.00657.X
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum
Peter Matthiessen1, Olof Hallböök2, Magnus Andersson, Jörgen Rutegård, Rune Sjödahl2
01 Nov 2004 - Colorectal Disease

Abstract:

Objective. Surgical technique and peri-operative management of rectal carcinoma have developed substantially in the last decades. Despite this, morbidity and mortality after anterior resection of the rectum are still important problems. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage in anterior res... Objective. Surgical technique and peri-operative management of rectal carcinoma have developed substantially in the last decades. Despite this, morbidity and mortality after anterior resection of the rectum are still important problems. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage in anterior resection and to assess the role of a temporary stoma and the need for urgent re-operations in relation to anastomotic leakage.Patients and methods. In a nine-year period, from 1987 to 1995, a total of 6833 patients underwent elective anterior resection of the rectum in Sweden. A random sample of 432 of these patients was analysed (sample size 6.3%). The associations between death and 10 patient-and surgery-related variables were studied by univariate and multivariate analysis. Data were obtained by review of the hospital files from all patients.Results. The incidence of symptomatic clinically evident anastomotic leakage was 12% (53/432). The 30-day mortality was 2.1% (140/6833). The rate of mortality associated with leakage was 7.5%. A temporary stoma was initially fashioned in 17% (72/432) of the patients, and 15% (11/72) with a temporary stoma had a clinical leakage, compared with 12% (42/360) without a temporary stoma, not significant. Multivariate analysis showed that low anastomosis (≤ 6 cm), pre-operative radiation, presence of intra-opcrative adverse events and male gender were independent risk factors for leakage. The risk for permanent stoma after leakage was 25%. Females with stoma leaked in 3% compared to men with stoma who leaked in 29%. The median hospital stay for patients Arithout leakage was 10 days (range 5-61 days) and for patients with leakage 22 days (3-110 days).Conclusion. In this population based study, 12% of the patients had symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Postoperative 30-day mortality was 2.1%. Low anastomosis, pre-operative radiation, presence of intra-operative adverse events and male gender were independent risk factors for symptomatic anastomotic leakage in the multivariate analysis. There was no difference in the use of temporary stoma in patients with or without anastomotic leakage. read more read less

Topics:

Anastomosis (52%)52% related to the paper, Colectomy (52%)52% related to the paper
550 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1463-1318.2008.01660.X
Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery
Feza H. Remzi1, Hasan T. Kirat1, Jihad H. Kaouk1, Daniel P. Geisler1
01 Oct 2008 - Colorectal Disease

Abstract:

Purpose Laparoscopy is the approach of choice for the majority of colorectal disorders that require a minimally invasive abdominal operation. As the emphasis on minimizing the technique continues, natural orifice surgery is quickly evolving. The authors utilized an embryologic natural orifice, the umbilicus, as sole access to... Purpose Laparoscopy is the approach of choice for the majority of colorectal disorders that require a minimally invasive abdominal operation. As the emphasis on minimizing the technique continues, natural orifice surgery is quickly evolving. The authors utilized an embryologic natural orifice, the umbilicus, as sole access to the abdomen to perform a colorectal procedure. Herein, we present our initial experience of single-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery using a Uni-X™ Single-Port Access Laparoscopic System (Pnavel Systems, Morganville, New Jersey, USA) with a multi-channel cannula and specially designed curved laparoscopic instrumentation. Method  The abdomen was approached through a 3.5 cm incision via the umbilicus and a single-port access device was utilized to perform a right hemicolectomy on a patient with an unresectable caecal polyp and a body mass index of 35. Ligation of the ileocolic artery was done with a LigaSure Device™ (Covidien Ltd, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA), and was followed by colonic mobilization, extraction and extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. Results  The total operative time was 115 min with minimal blood loss. Hospital stay was 4 days with no undue sequelae. Conclusion  Single-port laparoscopic surgery may allow common colorectal laparoscopic operations to be performed entirely through the patient’s umbilicus and enable an essentially scarless procedure. Additional experience and continued investigation are warranted. read more read less

Topics:

Single-port laparoscopy (65%)65% related to the paper, Laparoscopic surgery (60%)60% related to the paper, Laparoscopy (56%)56% related to the paper, Colorectal surgery (53%)53% related to the paper, Ileocolic artery (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
522 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1463-1318.2006.01051.X
Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
Andrew Shorthouse1
01 Jun 2006 - Colorectal Disease

Abstract:

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland has been approached by the Royal College of Surgeons on behalf of a Coroner to remind colorectal and general surgeons about the risk of large bowel obstruction caused by inadvertent delivery of the wrong end of divided bowel when fashioning an end colostomy. Risks... The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland has been approached by the Royal College of Surgeons on behalf of a Coroner to remind colorectal and general surgeons about the risk of large bowel obstruction caused by inadvertent delivery of the wrong end of divided bowel when fashioning an end colostomy. Risks may be increased when the trephine method is employed, especially trephine sigmoid colostomy (1,2,3). The sigmoid colon is normally identified by the presence of appendices epiploicae and absence of omentum, but errors may occur with: Trephine stoma [1, 2] Trephine sigmoid colostomy, normally identified by appendices epiploicae and absence of omentum, risks: • delivery of transverse colon in error; • difficulty in identifying the ideal segment for the stoma; • closure of the proximal segment and maturation of the distal defunctioned segment, resulting in complete colonic obstruction. It is surprising that there are few publications describing this problem, which can potentially lead to perforation and fatal peritonitis. Yet no doubt there are some colorectal surgeons, including myself, who will be anecdotally aware of such cases. So what precautions should be taken? 1 Be aware of the possibility. 2 For a sigmoid colostomy, set up in the Lloyd Davis position. It is essential to have access to the anus to allow insufflation of air to identify the proximal and distal ends of the sigmoid before dividing the bowel. With this manoeuvre, the correct end will always be brought out. 3 Consider a loop stoma, if clinically appropriate, but bear in mind that redundant bowel might still twist and obstruct. 4 After construction of an end colostomy with laparotomy, check the underside of the trephine to ensure that the ‘proximal’ end has been delivered through the trephine, and consider marking the proximal end with an identifiable suture before delivery. 5 With a trephine sigmoid colostomy consider the following alternatives: • Combining flexible sigmoidoscopy and air insufflation with either laparoscopy, or a short midline laparotomy [1]; • Insufflating air via an enterotomy in the sigmoid loop toward the rectum to confirm the distal end [3]. • Occluding the bowel with a soft clamp and inflating air from the anus. However, this may be inadequate, as inflation of a redundant divided distal segment may increase intra-abdominal pressure sufficient to cause flatus to emerge from the proximal colon [2]. • an intra-operative water soluble contrast enema [5]. 6 Orientation of a trephine ileostomy is facilitated by identification of the antimesenteric fat in the distal few centimeters of terminal ileum and ⁄ or caecum. Before delivery through the trephine, the proximal loop is ideally orientated inferiorly to achieve an optimal spout. After delivery, the distal loop should be marked to ensure that the proximal and not the distal loop is spouted. 7 Laparoscopically assisted stoma formation aids identification of the terminal ileum or sigmoid and facilitates orientation, and is probably associated with less bleeding than the trephine method [6]. 8 If the stoma fails to function after 5–7 days, arrange a CT abdominal scan and, if necessary, a water-soluble contrast enema. Evolving large bowel obstructionmay be difficult to differentiate clinically from postoperative ileus. read more read less
438 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1463-1318.2005.00747.X
A meta‐analysis of the association of physical activity with reduced risk of colorectal cancer
A. K. A. Samad1, Rod S Taylor2, Tom Marshall2, M A S Chapman1
01 May 2005 - Colorectal Disease

Abstract:

Background Physical activity may be associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer. The main aim of this paper is to review the available evidence for a link between exercise and large bowel cancer. Methods  A Cochrane-type methodology was performed. Data extracted included, type of study, type of physical activity meas... Background Physical activity may be associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer. The main aim of this paper is to review the available evidence for a link between exercise and large bowel cancer. Methods  A Cochrane-type methodology was performed. Data extracted included, type of study, type of physical activity measured and the numerical results. The risk ratios (RR) of the studies have been pooled according to the type of study, type of exercise, type of cancer and sex. Pooling was undertaken using fixed effect meta-analysis. A random effect meta-analysis was used where substantial heterogeneity existed. Result  Data from 19 cohort studies showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of colon cancer in physically active males, RR being 0.79 (95% CI 0.72–0.87) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.68–0.91) for occupational and recreational activities, respectively. In women only recreational activities are protective against colon cancer (RR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.57–0.88). Case-control studies showed significantly reduced risks of colon cancer in both sexes irrespective of the type of activity. No protection against rectal cancer is seen in either sex. Conclusion  There is considerable evidence that physical activity is associated with reduced risk of colon cancer in both males and females. read more read less

Topics:

Cancer (58%)58% related to the paper, Colorectal cancer (56%)56% related to the paper, Relative risk (52%)52% related to the paper, Retrospective cohort study (51%)51% related to the paper, Cohort study (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
354 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Colorectal Disease.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Colorectal Disease format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Colorectal Disease in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Colorectal Disease guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Colorectal Disease guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Colorectal Disease guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Colorectal Disease?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Colorectal Disease citation style.

4. Can I use the Colorectal Disease templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Colorectal Disease.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Colorectal Disease that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Colorectal Disease that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Colorectal Disease?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Colorectal Disease.

7. Where can I find the template for the Colorectal Disease?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Colorectal Disease's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Colorectal Disease's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Colorectal Disease an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Colorectal Disease is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Colorectal Disease?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Colorectal Disease?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Colorectal Disease?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Colorectal Disease, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Colorectal Disease's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Colorectal Disease?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Colorectal Disease. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Colorectal Disease?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Colorectal Disease are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Colorectal Disease?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Colorectal Disease's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Colorectal Disease in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Colorectal Disease Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Colorectal Disease formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template