scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of the Ryukyus

EducationOkinawa, Japan
About: University of the Ryukyus is a education organization based out in Okinawa, Japan. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Electric power system. The organization has 6726 authors who have published 13774 publications receiving 261846 citations. The organization is also known as: Ryūkyū Daigaku.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These guidelines are presented for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

4,316 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of the methods that can be used by investigators who are attempting to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as by reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that investigate these processes are presented.
Abstract: Research in autophagy continues to accelerate,(1) and as a result many new scientists are entering the field Accordingly, it is important to establish a standard set of criteria for monitoring macroautophagy in different organisms Recent reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose(2,3) There are many useful and convenient methods that can be used to monitor macroautophagy in yeast, but relatively few in other model systems, and there is much confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure macroautophagy in higher eukaryotes A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers of autophagosomes versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway; thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from fully functional autophagy that includes delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi) Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of the methods that can be used by investigators who are attempting to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as by reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that investigate these processes This set of guidelines is not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to verify an autophagic response

2,310 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management ofhypertension (JSH 2009) provide guidelines for the management ofpertension in patients with high blood pressure.
Abstract: The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2009)

1,409 citations


Authors

Showing all 6766 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Se-Kwon Kim10276339344
Laurent Keller8536026049
Takashi Yamamoto84140135169
Mitsuhiro Osame7656522433
J. David Curb7018222831
Mutsumi Nishida6834214867
Charles R. M. Bangham6826716196
I. Bernard Weinstein6726015899
Hiroyuki Osada6765118192
Graham P. Taylor6736515282
Robert Sinclair6650516981
Takashi Uchiyama6531719261
Chiea Chuen Khor6428616634
Michael D. Jennions6423718502
Shigeru Kuratani6324111842
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Hokkaido University
115.4K papers, 2.6M citations

94% related

Hiroshima University
69.2K papers, 1.4M citations

93% related

University of Tsukuba
79.4K papers, 1.9M citations

92% related

University of Tokyo
337.5K papers, 10.1M citations

92% related

Kyushu University
135.1K papers, 3M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202315
202264
2021713
2020643
2019622
2018658