Plant Ecology 

About: Plant Ecology is an academic journal published by Springer Science+Business Media. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Plant ecology & Vegetation. It has an ISSN identifier of 1385-0237. Over the lifetime, 5545 publications have been published receiving 230158 citations.

Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique

Abstract: Studies by ourselves and others (Swan 1970, Austin & Noy-Meir 1972, Beals 1973, Hill 1973, 1974, Austin 1976a, b, Fasham 1977, Gauch Whittaker & Wentwarth 1977, Noy-Meir & Whittaker 1977, Orloci 1978, Gauch, Whittaker & Singer 1979) have found faults with all ordination techniques currently in use, at least when applied to ecological data specifying the occurrences of species in community samples. These faults certainly do not make existing techniques useless; but they mean that results must be interpreted with caution. Even with the best techniques, the underlying structure of the data is often poorly expressed.

Spatial pattern and ecological analysis

Abstract: The spatial heterogeneity of populations and communities plays a central role in many ecological theories, for instance the theories of succession, adaptation, maintenance of species diversity, community stability, competition, predator-prey interactions, parasitism, epidemics and other natural catastrophes, ergoclines, and so on. This paper will review how the spatial structure of biological populations and communities can be studied. We first demonstrate that many of the basic statistical methods used in ecological studies are impaired by autocorrelated data. Most if not all environmental data fall in this category. We will look briefly at ways of performing valid statistical tests in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Methods now available for analysing the spatial structure of biological populations are described, and illustrated by vegetation data. These include various methods to test for the presence of spatial autocorrelation in the data: univariate methods (all-directional and two-dimensional spatial correlograms, and two-dimensional spectral analysis), and the multivariate Mantel test and Mantel correlogram; other descriptive methods of spatial structure: the univariate variogram, and the multivariate methods of clustering with spatial contiguity constraint; the partial Mantel test, presented here as a way of studying causal models that include space as an explanatory variable; and finally, various methods for mapping ecological variables and producing either univariate maps (interpolation, trend surface analysis, kriging) or maps of truly multivariate data (produced by constrained clustering). A table shows the methods classified in terms of the ecological questions they allow to resolve. Reference is made to available computer programs.

Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance

Abstract: The robustness of quantitative measures of compositional dissimilarity between sites was evaluated using extensive computer simulations of species’ abundance patterns over one and two dimensional configurations of sample sites in ecological space. Robustness was equated with the strength, over a range of models, of the linear and monotonic (rank-order) relationship between the compositional dissimilarities and the corresponding Euclidean distances between sites measured in the ecological space. The range of models reflected different assumptions about species’ response curve shape, sampling pattern of sites, noise level of the data, species’ interactions, trends in total site abundance, and beta diversity of gradients.

An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination

Abstract: Simulated vegetation data were used to assess the relative robustness of ordination techniques to variations in the model of community variation in relation to environment. The methods compared were local non-metric multidimensional scaling (LNMDS), detrended correspondence analysis (DCA), Gaussian ordination (GO), principal components analysis (PCA) and principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA). Both LNMDS and PCoA were applied to a matrix of Bray-Curtis coefficients. The results clearly demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the linear techniques (PCA, PCoA), due to curvilinear distortion. Gaussian ordination proved very sensitive to noise and was not robust to marked departures from a symmetric, unimodal response model. The currently popular method of DCA displayed a lack of robustness to variations in the response model and the sampling pattern. Furthermore, DCA ordinations of two-dimensional models often exhibited marked distortions, even when response surfaces were unimodal and symmetric. LNMDS is recommended as a robust technique for indirect gradient analysis, which deserves more widespread use by community ecologists.

Transformation of Cover-Abundance Values in Phytosociology and its Effects on Community Similarity

Abstract: The numerical treatment of phytosociological data is often based on estimates of cover and/or abundance according to the Braun-Blanquet and Domin scales. Since Schwickerath (1931, 1938, 1940) and Tuxen & Ellenberg (1937) published their transformations there has been discussion on the way the scale values should be used in calculations Qualitative approaches, i.e. based on presence and absence have also been favoured (e.g. Williams & Lambert 1959, van der Maarel 1966) Dagnelie (I960) proposed a pseudoqualitative basis for various calculations by means of a ‘coupure’. A coupure includes the deletion of lower values, usually according to a fixed criterion, e.g. the number of occurrences in a phytosociological table to be remained should be as close as possible to 50%. Dagnelie’s approach remained largely unknown and apparently it has never been tested.