scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator.

TLDR
A novel weighted median estimator for combining data on multiple genetic variants into a single causal estimate is presented, which is consistent even when up to 50% of the information comes from invalid instrumental variables.
Abstract
Developments in genome-wide association studies and the increasing availability of summary genetic association data have made application of Mendelian randomization relatively straightforward. However, obtaining reliable results from a Mendelian randomization investigation remains problematic, as the conventional inverse-variance weighted method only gives consistent estimates if all of the genetic variants in the analysis are valid instrumental variables. We present a novel weighted median estimator for combining data on multiple genetic variants into a single causal estimate. This estimator is consistent even when up to 50% of the information comes from invalid instrumental variables. In a simulation analysis, it is shown to have better finite-sample Type 1 error rates than the inverse-variance weighted method, and is complementary to the recently proposed MR-Egger (Mendelian randomization-Egger) regression method. In analyses of the causal effects of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol on coronary artery disease risk, the inverse-variance weighted method suggests a causal effect of both lipid fractions, whereas the weighted median and MR-Egger regression methods suggest a null effect of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol that corresponds with the experimental evidence. Both median-based and MR-Egger regression methods should be considered as sensitivity analyses for Mendelian randomization investigations with multiple genetic variants.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome

TL;DR: MR-Base is a platform that integrates a curated database of complete GWAS results (no restrictions according to statistical significance) with an application programming interface, web app and R packages that automate 2SMR, and includes several sensitivity analyses for assessing the impact of horizontal pleiotropy and other violations of assumptions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases.

TL;DR: The MR-PRESSO test detects and corrects horizontal pleiotropy in multi-instrument Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses and introduces distortions in the causal estimates in MR that ranged on average from –131% to 201%; it is shown using simulations that the MR-pressO test is best suited when horizontal Pleiotropy occurs in <50% of instruments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide explanations of the information typically reported in Mendelian randomisation studies that can be used to assess the plausibility of these assumptions and guidance on how to interpret findings from such studies in the context of other sources of evidence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method

TL;DR: There are several reasons why causal estimates from the MR-Egger method may be biased and have inflated Type 1 error rates in practice, including violations of the InSIDE assumption and the influence of outlying variants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.

TL;DR: The mode-based estimate (MBE) is proposed to obtain a single causal effect estimate from multiple genetic instruments and is used by investigating the causal effect of plasma lipid fractions and urate levels on coronary heart disease risk.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

TL;DR: Funnel plots, plots of the trials' effect estimates against sample size, are skewed and asymmetrical in the presence of publication bias and other biases Funnel plot asymmetry, measured by regression analysis, predicts discordance of results when meta-analyses are compared with single large trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.

TL;DR: In this paper, a rank-based data augmentation technique is proposed for estimating the number of missing studies that might exist in a meta-analysis and the effect that these studies might have had on its outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?

TL;DR: Mendelian randomization provides new opportunities to test causality and demonstrates how investment in the human genome project may contribute to understanding and preventing the adverse effects on human health of modifiable exposures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression

TL;DR: An adaption of Egger regression can detect some violations of the standard instrumental variable assumptions, and provide an effect estimate which is not subject to these violations, and provides a sensitivity analysis for the robustness of the findings from a Mendelian randomization investigation.
Related Papers (5)