scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Sameer Maithel
- 01 Feb 2008 - 
- Vol. 44, Iss: 1, pp 53-55
TLDR
In this article, a recent report suggests that the overall energy consumption can be reduced by 25 per cent by taking appropriate energy conservation measures in India and that a rapid deployment of new renewable energy technologies, both for electricity generation and for thermal applications, can result in significant reduction in demand for fossil fuels.
Abstract
To achieve a sustained growth of 8 per cent during the period 2005–31, India would need to grow its primary energy supply by three to four times. Similarly, China’s energy demand is expected to increase by two to two-and-a-half times during the same period. By 2030, the two countries combined together would account for around 25 per cent of the total energy consumption in the world and would become two of the largest carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emitters. The overall demand for energy in the two countries can be significantly lowered by adopting energy efficiency measures to lower energy intensity. A recent report suggests that the overall energy consumption can be reduced by 25 per cent by taking appropriate energy conservation measures in India. Also, a rapid deployment of new renewable energy technologies, both for electricity generation and for thermal applications, can result in significant reduction in demand for fossil fuels. These measures would not only result in lowering the CO 2 emissions and reducing the dependence of the two countries on energy imports, but would also assist in building of a more sustainable and efficient energy infrastructure in the two countries. Some of the common areas of interest for the two countries in energy efficiency and renewable energy are:

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

A
ssessing
The
P
otential
For
R
enewable
E
nergy
On
P
ublic
L
ands
F
ebruary
2003
U.S. D
epartment
of
the
I
nterior
B
ureau
of
L
and
M
anagement
U.S. D
epartment
of
E
nergy
E
nergy
E
fficiency
and
R
enewable
E
nergy
Download CD ZIP 
File (248 MB)
Download CD-Lite 
ZIP File with no 
GIS Data or 
Acrobat Reader 
Installers (43 MB)
CD-Lite Version

A
ssessing
The
P
otential
For
R
enewable
E
nergy
On
P
ublic
L
ands
U.S. D
epartment
of
the
I
nterior
B
ureau
of
L
and
M
anagement
U.S. D
epartment
of
E
nergy
E
nergy
E
fficiency
and
R
enewable
E
nergy
DOE/GO-102003-1704
February 2003

NOTICE
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.
Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any
warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or
usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not
infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by
trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions
of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any
agency thereof.
Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge
Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy
and its contractors, in paper, from:
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
P.O. Box 62
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062
phone: 865.576.8401
fax: 865.576.5728
email: reports@adonis.osti.gov
Available for sale to the public, in paper, from:
U.S. Department of Commerce
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
phone: 800.553.6847
fax: 703.605.6900
email: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov
online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm
Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 20% postconsumer waste
COVER PHOTOS (top to bottom): Wind turbines, Palm Springs, CA (PIX 01241, Warren Gretz, NREL);
photovoltaic system, Lake Powell, UT (PIX 08022, Warren Gretz); hybrid cottonwood tree farm,
Washington State (PIX 00241, Warren Gretz); concentrating solar power system, southwestern U.S.
(courtesy of Henry Price, NREL); geothermal power plant, Sierra Nevada range, CA (PIX 10991, courtesy
of Geothermal Resources Council).

iii
Acknowledgments
David Garman, Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP), and the DOE National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
gratefully acknowledge Ray Brady, Mike Kirby, and Lee Otteni in the Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
Department of the Interior, for their contributions to this partnership project in support of BLM’s National Energy
Policy activities. Their vision and commitment enabled the project partners to assess public lands with the highest
potential for renewable energy resource development by industry.
The primary authors of this report are Mike Kirby (National Science and Technology Center, BLM); Doug Dahle,
project leader (Federal Energy Management Program, NREL); Donna Heimiller (Distributed Energy Resource
Center, NREL); Barbara Farhar (Geothermal Program, NREL); and Brandon Owens (formerly in the Energy
Analysis Office, NREL). The authors thank DOE FEMP Director Beth Shearer and FEMP Renewable Energy
Program Lead Anne Sprunt Crawley for funding and programmatic support. We also thank DOE Wind &
Hydropower Program Manager Peter Goldman for providing NREL technology staff support in the development of
the report. And we thank the following NREL staff members for their contributions:
Mark Mehos and Hank Price (Concentrating Solar Power).
Byron Stafford and John Thornton (Photovoltaics)
Ed Cannon, Larry Flowers, and Brian Parsons (Wind)
Richard Bain, Kevin Craig, and Ralph Overend (Biomass)
Gerry Nix (Geothermal)
Liz Brady-Sabeff and Dave Renne’ (Distributed Energy Resources Center)
Tonya Cook, May Anne Dunlap, and Paula Pitchford, (Communications)
Judy Hulstrom, Kathy Rose, and Margo Stenzel (Information Services)
Pam Lee-Bull and Judy Powers (NREL FEMP)
Lynn Kaemmerer (Human Resources).
We are also grateful to these BLM and DOE experts for contributions regarding the geothermal “top-pick” sites:
Paul Dunlevy (Geothermal Program Lead, BLM, Washington, DC)
Rich Hoops and Jack Kelly (BLM Nevada State Office)
Nancy Ketrenos, Duane Dippon, Corey Plank, and Eric Stone (BLM Oregon/Washington State Office)
Sean Hagerty, Sonja Santillan, and Larry Vredenberg (BLM California State Office)
Jim Fouts and Al McKee (BLM Utah State Office)
Jay Spielman and Joe Torrez (BLM New Mexico State Office)
Bill Lee (BLM Idaho State Office)
Susan Norwood (Geopowering the West Program, DOE)
Joel Renner (Idaho National Energy Engineering Laboratory, DOE).
And we thank Mary James, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and John Townshend, University of
Maryland, for contributing biomass data (see Appendix B).
Also acknowledged for their voluntary contributions are these organizations and industry partners in Colorado:
Dale Osborne (Disgen, Inc.)
Doug Larson (Western Interstate Energy Board)
Ron Lehr (Attorney, WindPowering America)
John Neilson (Colorado Land & Water Fund)
Randy Manion (Western Area Power Administration)
Randy Gee (Duke Solar)
Roger Davenport (Science Applications International Corporation).
Finally, the authors thank all those who responded to BLM’s request for public comment on the draft.

iv
Assessing the Potential for
Renewable Energy on Public Lands
Contents Page
Acknowledgments............................................................................................................. iii
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1
1. Objective
...................................................................................................................... 2
2. Scope
............................................................................................................................ 2
3. Background .................................................................................................................. 2
4. The Approach for Assessing Renewable Energy Potential ......................................... 4
Task 1Gather available information on renewable energy potential
(including low-impact hydro, solar, wind, biomass and geothermal) ......................... 4
Task 2Develop appropriate screens ......................................................................... 6
Task 3Process data identifying broad geographical areas as high-,
medium-, and low- or no potential for renewable energy development .................... 11
Task 4Report on high-potential areas for inclusion in a
Renewable Energy Action Plan ................................................................................. 18
5. The Comparative Analysis ......................................................................................... 18
6. Recommendations
...................................................................................................... 26
7. List of Appendices
..................................................................................................... 27
A. Western U.S. Renewable Resource and BLM Land Ownership GIS Maps ....... A1
B. Detailed Description and Data Sets for GIS Maps
............................................. B1
C. Intermediate and Analysis Results GIS Maps .................................................... C1
D. Intermediate and “Top-Pick” GIS Maps for Geothermal Field-Based
Resource Assessment
.......................................................................................... D1
E. Planning Units with Highest Renewable Energy Potential ................................. E1
F. State Policies and Financial Incentives for Renewable Energy .......................... F1
G. References ........................................................................................................... G1
H. BLM, DOE, DOE National Laboratory Contacts
............................................... H1

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the effect of environmental policies on technological innovation in the specific case of renewable energy and found that broad-based policies, such as tradable energy certificates, are more likely to induce innovation on technologies that are close to competitive with fossil fuels.
Posted Content

Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the effect of environmental policies on technological innovation in the specific case of renewable energy, using patent data on a panel of 25 countries over the period 1978-2003.

Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited

TL;DR: LaRonde as mentioned in this paper analyzes the conflict in Xinjiang and concludes that the Chinese continue to defeat the separatist movement through a strategy that counters Mao's seven fundamentals of revolutionary warfare, concluding that Mao, as well as the communist leaders who followed him, was also successful at waging protracted counterinsurgency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advanced Demand Side Management for the Future Smart Grid Using Mechanism Design

TL;DR: Simulation results confirm that the proposed pricing method can benefit both users and utility companies and verify some important properties of the proposed VCG mechanism for demand side management such as efficiency, user truthfulness, and nonnegative transfer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate the feasibility of providing all energy for all purposes (electric power, transportation, and heating/cooling), everywhere in the world, from wind, water, and the sun (WWS).
References
Frequently Asked Questions (8)
Q1. How many BLM planning units in western states have high potential for power production from one or more?

Sixty-three BLM planning units in eleven western states have high potential for power production from one or more renewable energy sources.• 

Twenty BLM planning units in seven western states have high potential for powerproduction from three or more renewable energy sources. 

BLM will use this information in prioritizing land-use planning activities in order to increase industry’s development and use of the renewable energy resources on public lands. 

The BLM/NREL team used Geographic Information System (GIS) data to analyze and assess the potential for concentrating solar power (CSP), photovoltaics (PV), wind, and biomass resources and technologies on public lands. 

This assessment report provides BLM with information needed to evaluate the potential for renewable energy development on public lands. 

BLM experts identified 35 "top-pick" sites in 18 planning units in six states as having high potential for near-term development. 

241This report represents an important initial activity of the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) proposed National Energy Policy Implementation Plan, which is to identify and evaluate renewable energy resources on public lands and any limitations on access to them. 

4Task 1―Gather available information on renewable energy potential (including low-impact hydro, solar, wind, biomass and geothermal) .........................