Hydropolitics is what societies make of it (or why we need a constructivist approach to the geopolitics of water)

TLDR: In this paper, constructivism has been used to explore the potential of hydropolitics in the context of water-related international relations, with its anti-deterministic and pro-human agency stance, which can be explored if theorisation is made explicit.

Abstract: Although the study of hydropolitics (i.e. the geopolitics of water) is mainly an offshoot of the discipline of International Relations (IR), the use of IR conceptual tools remains largely implicit in the literature. As a result, theoretical exploration has been very limited in hydropolitics and is usually cast within IR’s traditional divide between realism and liberalism. This is problematic because the quest for a predictive and parsimonious science of politics that characterises mainstream IR theory may be overly rigid and too narrow a strategy to understand the full diversity exhibited by water-related interstate relations around the globe. With its anti-deterministic and pro-human agency stance, constructivism constitutes a promising alternative approach to hydropolitics that can be explored if theorisation is made explicit. In this regard, securitisation theory is one example of constructivism’s great potential in hydropolitical analysis.