A
Adrian John Wilkinson
Researcher at Griffith University
Publications - 382
Citations - 14953
Adrian John Wilkinson is an academic researcher from Griffith University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Human resource management & Industrial relations. The author has an hindex of 65, co-authored 360 publications receiving 13555 citations. Previous affiliations of Adrian John Wilkinson include Loughborough University & University of Manchester.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Empowerment: theory and practice
TL;DR: However, there are significant problems with much of the prescriptive literature on empowerment, in that there is little detailed discussion of the problems employers may experience implementing empowerment or the conditions which are necessary for such an approach to be successful as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Organizational Failure: a critique of recent research and a proposed integrative framework
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors address the major deficiencies observed in the diverse body of literature covering this field, suggest an integrative framework and identify the specific theoretical and methodological challenges ahead for researchers seeking to advance knowledge in the field of organizational failure.
Journal ArticleDOI
The sustainability debate
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the roles played by governments and corporations as developers of standards and legislation, and investors in products and processes, respectively, and discuss the company capacities required to achieve sustainability, paying particular attention to operations management capabilities and the management of human resources.
Journal ArticleDOI
Employment relations in SMEs
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore employment relations in SMEs and argue that the existing literature tends to polarise into a "small is beautiful" or "bleak house" perspective.
Journal ArticleDOI
The meanings and purpose of employee voice
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present and assess an analytical framework for examining the different'meanings, purposes and practices' of employee voice and find that the degree to which voice practices are embedded in an organization is much more important than reporting the extent of any particular individual or collective schemes for employee voice.