BACKGROUND: The delivery of effective, high-quality patient care is a complex activity. It demands health and social care professionals collaborate in an effective manner. Research continues to suggest that collaboration between these professionals can be problematic. Interprofessional education (IPE) offers a possible way to improve interprofessional collaboration and patient care. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of IPE interventions compared to separate, profession-specific education interventions; and to assess the effectiveness of IPE interventions compared to no education intervention.
SEARCH METHODS: For this update we searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register, MEDLINE and CINAHL, for the years 2006 to 2011. We also handsearched the Journal of Interprofessional Care (2006 to 2011), reference lists of all included studies, the proceedings of leading IPE conferences, and websites of IPE organisations. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before and after (CBA) studies and interrupted time series (ITS) studies of IPE interventions that reported objectively measured or self reported (validated instrument) patient/client or healthcare process outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of potentially relevant studies. For included studies, at least two review authors extracted data and assessed study quality. A meta-analysis of study outcomes was not possible due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures. Consequently, the results are presented in a narrative format. MAIN RESULTS: This update located nine new studies, which were added to the six studies from our last update in 2008. This review now includes 15 studies (eight RCTs, five CBA and two ITS studies). All of these studies measured the effectiveness of IPE interventions compared to no educational intervention. Seven studies indicated that IPE produced positive outcomes in the following areas: diabetes care, emergency department culture and patient satisfaction; collaborative team behaviour and reduction of clinical error rates for emergency department teams; collaborative team behaviour in operating rooms; management of care delivered in cases of domestic violence; and mental health practitioner competencies related to the delivery of patient care. In addition, four of the studies reported mixed outcomes (positive and neutral) and four studies reported that the IPE interventions had no impact on either professional practice or patient care. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This updated review reports on 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria (nine studies from this update and six studies from the 2008 update). Although these studies reported some positive outcomes, due to the small number of studies and the heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures, it is not possible to draw generalisable inferences about the key elements of IPE and its effectiveness. To improve the quality of evidence relating to IPE and patient outcomes or healthcare process outcomes, the following three gaps will need to be filled: first, studies that assess the effectiveness of IPE interventions compared to separate, profession-specific interventions; second, RCT, CBA or ITS studies with qualitative strands examining processes relating to the IPE and practice changes; third, cost-benefit analyses.

/pdf/interprofessional-education-effects-on-professional-practice-frwteh5fla.pdf

Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update)

The main purpose of this paper is to draw attention to some facts and ideas that perhaps can help to identify problems or fields for development and research within the evaluation of training. Topics for group discussion are preceded by material on some basic concepts of evaluation and educational measurement. The ratio scale, the interval scale, the ordinal scale, and the nominal scale are given as examples of kinds of scales used in educational measurement; the problem of norms is discussed; potential purposes of evaluation or educational measurement are outlined; and some characteristics of a good measuring instrument are explained. The author also defends the inclusion of evaluation as an Integral part of a model for planning and carrying out educational programs. (BW) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions * * supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. *********************************************************************** U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION &WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION EVALUATION OF TRAINING

/pdf/evaluation-of-training-4s7htqhxas.pdf

Evaluation of Training.

http://eta.health.usf.edu/publichealth/HSC4211_HBS/readings/socialEnvironment_MacNeil.pdf

Social Environment and Physical activity: A review of concepts and evidence

Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) aims to bring together different professionals to learn with, from, and about one another in order to collaborate more effectively in the delivery of safe, high-quality care for patients/clients. Given its potential for improving collaboration and care delivery, there have been repeated calls for the wider-scale implementation of IPE across education and clinical settings. Increasingly, a range of IPE initiatives are being implemented and evaluated which are adding to the growth of evidence for this form of education.Aim: The overall aim of this review is to update a previous BEME review published in 2007. In doing so, this update sought to synthesize the evolving nature of the IPE evidence.Methods: Medline, CINAHL, BEI, and ASSIA were searched from May 2005 to June 2014. Also, journal hand searches were undertaken. All potential abstracts and papers were screened by pairs of reviewers to determine inclusion. All included papers were assessed for metho...

/pdf/a-beme-systematic-review-of-the-effects-of-interprofessional-1pailso798.pdf

A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39

List of Boxes, Figures and Tables. The Authors. Series Foreword. Acknowledgements. Glossary. Introduction. 1. Interprofessional teamwork the basics. 2. Current developments affecting interprofessional teamwork. 3. Interprofessional teamwork: key concepts and issues. 4. A conceptual framework for interprofessional teamwork. 5. Using theory to better understand interprofessional teamwork. 6. Interprofessional teamwork interventions. 7. Evaluating interprofessional teamwork. 8. Synthesising studies of interprofessional teamwork. 9. Ways forward. References. Appendices. Index.

Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care

Background and review context: Evidence to support the proposition that learning together will help practitioners and agencies work better together remains limited and thinly spread. This review id...

A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9

Social capital is widely considered to influence health. It is usually defined as a list of components such as social networks, social participation, trust and reciprocity. It is trust and reciprocity that are the subjects of this article. The presumed relationship of each with health is rarely explained in social capital studies. Trust is usually treated simplistically, both conceptually and in relation to measurement, while reciprocity is misunderstood, under-theorized and rarely measured. Pathways from trust and reciprocity to better health may be by way of reduced stress. Clarification and valid measures are needed to progress studies of social capital and health.

Social Capital and Health Starting to Make Sense of the Role of Generalized Trust and Reciprocity

Concern exists that the transition from student to doctor is abrupt and stressful, and that new graduates lack both clinical skills and confidence. This paper explores the effect of a preparation programme on the confidence and skills of new graduates commencing their first clinical post. Fifty-three participants in two English hospitals undertook a two-week induction combining life support, emergency and clinical skills training with administrative induction and shadowing the outgoing house officer. Questionnaires and focus groups at the beginning, end, and one month following the programme explored participants' perceptions. Respondents were initially anxious about starting work, concerned mainly about clinical skills; taking responsibility; being alone; non-technical skills; and local geography and procedures. Confidence increased following the programme, and the programme's contents directly mitigated some fears. Shadowing was most highly valued, though experiences varied; acute emergency training was also valued, but clinical skills revision was more variably received. Having commenced work, these perceptions remained. Confidence increased further, but clinical practice still represented a steep learning curve. This programme to support the transition from medical student to practising doctor was useful and effective, but could be improved. Increasing responsibility during shadowing could effect an even smoother transition.

Bridging the gap: supporting the transition from medical student to practising doctor--a two-week preparation programme after graduation.

A qualitative study of interorganizational relationship management Interorganizational relationships offer strategic solutions to help firms overcome resource limitations and potentially improve firm performance. In order to benefit from these alliances, adequate relationship management is key. By repeatedly dealing with interorganizational relationships, organizations gain collaborative experience, which may increase their ability to manage future alliances. In order to enhance the development of such alliance capability, it is crucial to understand how organizations learn from collaborative experience. The current thesis adds to that understanding by providing insight into how the diversity of interorganizational relationships, the fragmentation of alliance management knowhow, the applicability of collaborative experience and the configuration of alliance management activities influence learning about alliance management.

Della Freeth

Papers

A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9

Social Capital and Health Starting to Make Sense of the Role of Generalized Trust and Reciprocity

Bridging the gap: supporting the transition from medical student to practising doctor--a two-week preparation programme after graduation.

Learning to collaborate.