scispace - formally typeset
W

William T. Neese

Researcher at Troy University

Publications -  19
Citations -  436

William T. Neese is an academic researcher from Troy University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Comparative advertising & Consumer ethnocentrism. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 19 publications receiving 428 citations. Previous affiliations of William T. Neese include University of Arkansas at Little Rock & Nicholls State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals

TL;DR: The qualitative assessment of scholarly journals plays an important role in promotion and tenure decisions, recognition, scholarly dialogue, and the contribution to the knowledge base of marketing as mentioned in this paper, and the results of this study can be used by various marketing faculty constituencies to aid in evaluating publication importance via their selected reference groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

An analysis of federal mail and wire fraud cases related to marketing

TL;DR: The authors provided a review of marketing-related fraud cases found in federal courts through a LEXIS search to determine the nature of the prosecution and judgments and provided a foundation for understanding federal cases that can influence all marketing fraud decisions.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Influence of Comparative Advertising on Consumer Ethnocentrism in the American Automobile Market

TL;DR: This paper explored the ability of comparative advertising featuring foreign and domestic automobile brands to influence consumer ethnocentric reactions as the advertisement is being processed, and found that advertising where a foreign sponsor names a domestic brand can result in an ethnocalentric stimulus significantly influencing automobile brand Purchase Intentions.
Book ChapterDOI

Local Retail Segmentation using the CETSCALE: A Test of Comparative Advertising Effectiveness in the Domestic Versus Imported Luxury Sedan Market

TL;DR: Shimp and Sharma's (1987) CETSCALE was used to segment a local retail luxury sedan market into pro-import and Buy American groups as discussed by the authors, finding that the pro import segment favored the hard-hitting direct comparison format (i.e., 7-8 below) significantly less than the Buy American segment, finding it less believable (p=.026), less likable, less convincing, not as professional, and more boring.