Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format
Recent searches

Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format Example of Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Infectious Diseases #50 of 288 down down by 1 rank
Microbiology (medical) #26 of 116 down down by 6 ranks
Microbiology #39 of 150 down down by 4 ranks
Virology #19 of 69 up up by 3 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 365 Published Papers | 2369 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 30/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 23.9
SJR: 4.491
SNIP: 3.727
open access Open Access

Hindawi

Quality:  
Medium
CiteRatio: 2.1
SJR: 0.593
SNIP: 1.012
open access Open Access

Frontiers Media

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.812
SNIP: 1.485
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.0
SJR: 1.026
SNIP: 1.34

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.767

22% from 2018

Impact factor for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.767
2018 3.09
2017 3.141
2016 3.139
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

6.5

20% from 2019

CiteRatio for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.5
2019 5.4
2018 5.6
2017 5.7
2016 5.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 22% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 20% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.211

8% from 2019

SJR for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.211
2019 1.122
2018 1.145
2017 1.264
2016 1.392
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.49

39% from 2019

SNIP for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.49
2019 1.073
2018 1.137
2017 1.066
2016 1.063
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 39% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy

Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease.... Read More

Infectious Diseases

Microbiology (medical)

Virology

Medicine

i
Last updated on
30 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1478-7210
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.087
i
Acceptance Rate
80%
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1586/ERI.13.12
Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens.
Jack Norman Pendleton1, Sean P. Gorman1, Brendan Gilmore1

Abstract:

In recent years, the Infectious Diseases Society of America has highlighted a faction of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp.) - acronymically dubbed 'the ESKAPE pathogens' - capable of 'escaping... In recent years, the Infectious Diseases Society of America has highlighted a faction of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp.) - acronymically dubbed 'the ESKAPE pathogens' - capable of 'escaping' the biocidal action of antibiotics and mutually representing new paradigms in pathogenesis, transmission and resistance. This review aims to consolidate clinically relevant background information on the ESKAPE pathogens and provide a contemporary summary of bacterial resistance, alongside pertinent microbiological considerations necessary to face the mounting threat of antimicrobial resistance. read more read less

Topics:

Acinetobacter baumannii (55%)55% related to the paper, Antibiotic resistance (52%)52% related to the paper
1,039 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1586/ERI.11.59
Chitosan preparations for wounds and burns: antimicrobial and wound-healing effects
Tianhong Dai1, Masamitsu Tanaka1, Ying-Ying Huang1, Michael R. Hamblin2

Abstract:

Since its discovery approximately 200 years ago, chitosan, as a cationic natural polymer, has been widely used as a topical dressing in wound management owing to its hemostatic, stimulation of healing, antimicrobial, nontoxic, biocompatible and biodegradable properties. This article covers the antimicrobial and wound-healing ... Since its discovery approximately 200 years ago, chitosan, as a cationic natural polymer, has been widely used as a topical dressing in wound management owing to its hemostatic, stimulation of healing, antimicrobial, nontoxic, biocompatible and biodegradable properties. This article covers the antimicrobial and wound-healing effects of chitosan, as well as its derivatives and complexes, and its use as a vehicle to deliver biopharmaceuticals, antimicrobials and growth factors into tissue. Studies covering applications of chitosan in wounds and burns can be classified into in vitro, animal and clinical studies. Chitosan preparations are classified into native chitosan, chitosan formulations, complexes and derivatives with other substances. Chitosan can be used to prevent or treat wound and burn infections not only because of its intrinsic antimicrobial properties, but also by virtue of its ability to deliver extrinsic antimicrobial agents to wounds and burns. It can also be used as a slow-release drug-delivery vehicle for growth factors to improve wound healing. The large number of publications in this area suggests that chitosan will continue to be an important agent in the management of wounds and burns. read more read less

Topics:

Antimicrobial (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
739 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1586/ERI.12.50
Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: changes in incidence, pathogens and outcomes
Greg S. Martin1

Abstract:

Sepsis has been around since the dawn of time, having been described for more than 2000 years, although clinical definitions are recent. The consensus sepsis definitions have permitted worldwide epidemiological studies of sepsis to be conducted. We now recognize the common nature of sepsis and the consistency of its disease –... Sepsis has been around since the dawn of time, having been described for more than 2000 years, although clinical definitions are recent. The consensus sepsis definitions have permitted worldwide epidemiological studies of sepsis to be conducted. We now recognize the common nature of sepsis and the consistency of its disease – particularly severe sepsis and septic shock. The incidence of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock continues to increase, and although Gram-positive bacterial pathogens remain the most common cause of sepsis, fungal organisms are increasing rapidly. We have made progress over the past half-century in identifying and treating patients with sepsis, and decreasing fatality rates reflect this progress. However, owing to the increasing incidence of sepsis, the number of people who die each year continues to increase. The mortality with sepsis, particularly related to treating organ dysfunction, remains a priority to clinicians worldwide and is deserving of greater public health attention. read more read less

Topics:

Sepsis (61%)61% related to the paper, Septic shock (57%)57% related to the paper, Organ dysfunction (53%)53% related to the paper
602 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1586/14787210.5.6.951
Alternative mechanisms of action of cationic antimicrobial peptides on bacteria
John D. F. Hale1, Robert E. W. Hancock1

Abstract:

Cationic antimicrobial peptides are a novel type of antibiotic offering much potential in the treatment of microbial-related diseases. They offer many advantages for commercial development, including a broad spectrum of action and modest size. However, despite the identification or synthetic production of thousands of such pe... Cationic antimicrobial peptides are a novel type of antibiotic offering much potential in the treatment of microbial-related diseases. They offer many advantages for commercial development, including a broad spectrum of action and modest size. However, despite the identification or synthetic production of thousands of such peptides, the mode of action remains elusive, except for a few examples. While the dogma for the mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides against bacteria is believed to be through pore formation or membrane barrier disruption, some peptides clearly act differently and other intracellular target sites have been identified. This article presents an updated review of how cationic antimicrobial peptides are able to affect bacterial killing, with a focus on internal targets. read more read less

Topics:

Antimicrobial peptides (67%)67% related to the paper
480 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2014.956092
Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in enterococci.
William R. Miller1, Jose M. Munita2, Cesar A. Arias3

Abstract:

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) enterococci are important nosocomial pathogens and a growing clinical challenge. These organisms have developed resistance to virtually all antimicrobials currently used in clinical practice using a diverse number of genetic strategies. Due to this ability to recruit antibiotic resistance determinant... Multidrug-resistant (MDR) enterococci are important nosocomial pathogens and a growing clinical challenge. These organisms have developed resistance to virtually all antimicrobials currently used in clinical practice using a diverse number of genetic strategies. Due to this ability to recruit antibiotic resistance determinants, MDR enterococci display a wide repertoire of antibiotic resistance mechanisms including modification of drug targets, inactivation of therapeutic agents, overexpression of efflux pumps and a sophisticated cell envelope adaptive response that promotes survival in the human host and the nosocomial environment. MDR enterococci are well adapted to survive in the gastrointestinal tract and can become the dominant flora under antibiotic pressure, predisposing the severely ill and immunocompromised patient to invasive infections. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms underlying antibiotic resistance in enterococci is the first step for devising strategies to control the spread of these organisms and potentially establish novel therapeutic approaches. read more read less

Topics:

Antibiotic resistance (56%)56% related to the paper, Drug resistance (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
466 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy citation style.

4. Can I use the Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy.

7. Where can I find the template for the Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template