Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format
Recent searches

Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format Example of European Journal of Social Psychology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

European Journal of Social Psychology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Psychology #50 of 289 down down by 9 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 354 Published Papers | 1557 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 12/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.3
SJR: 1.446
SNIP: 1.572
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.6
SJR: 2.728
SNIP: 3.196
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.4
SJR: 1.758
SNIP: 2.592
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.83
SNIP: 1.437

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.415

36% from 2018

Impact factor for European Journal of Social Psychology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.415
2018 1.775
2017 2.048
2016 1.973
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.4

22% from 2019

CiteRatio for European Journal of Social Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.4
2019 3.6
2018 4.0
2017 4.2
2016 3.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 36% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 22% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.609

15% from 2019

SJR for European Journal of Social Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.609
2019 1.401
2018 1.397
2017 1.337
2016 1.513
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.58

13% from 2019

SNIP for European Journal of Social Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.58
2019 1.401
2018 1.3
2017 1.415
2016 1.227
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

European Journal of Social Psychology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

European Journal of Social Psychology

The European Journal of Social Psychology is a truly international forum for high quality, peer reviewed, original research in all areas of social psychology. Our international editorial team encourages submissions based on empirical, meta-analytical and theoretical research, ...... Read More

Psychology

i
Last updated on
12 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0046-2772
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.475
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/EJSP.2420010202
Social categorization and intergroup behaviour
Henri Tajfel1, Michael Billig1, R. P. Bundy1, Claude Flament

Abstract:

The aim of the studies was to assess the effefcs of social categorization on intergroup behaviour when, in the intergroup situation, neither calculations of individual interest nor previously existing attitudes of hostility could have been said to have determined discriminative behaviour against an outgroup. These conditions ... The aim of the studies was to assess the effefcs of social categorization on intergroup behaviour when, in the intergroup situation, neither calculations of individual interest nor previously existing attitudes of hostility could have been said to have determined discriminative behaviour against an outgroup. These conditions were satisfied in the experimental design. In the first series of experiments, it was found that the subjects favoured their own group in the distribution of real rewards and penalities in a situation in which nothing but the variable of fairly irrelevant classification distinguished between the ingroup and the outgroup. In the second series of experiments it was found that: 1) maximum joint profit independent of group membership did not affect significantly the manner in which the subjects divided real pecuniary rewards; 2) maximum profit for own group did affect the distribution of rewards; 3) the clearest effect on the distribution of rewards was due to the subjects' attempt to achieve a maximum difference between the ingroup and the outgroup even at the price of sacrificing other ‘objective’ advantages. The design and the results of the study are theoretically discussed within the framework of social norms and expectations and particularly in relation to a ‘generic’ norm of outgroup behaviour prevalent in some societies. read more read less

Topics:

Common ingroup identity (64%)64% related to the paper, Out-group homogeneity (62%)62% related to the paper, Outgroup (61%)61% related to the paper, Ingroups and outgroups (56%)56% related to the paper, Minimal group paradigm (55%)55% related to the paper
4,523 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/EJSP.504
How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators
Thomas F. Pettigrew1, Linda R. Tropp2

Abstract:

Recent years have witnessed a renewal of interest in intergroup contact theory. A meta-analysis of more than 500 studies established the theory's basic contention that intergroup contact typically reduces prejudices of many types. This paper addresses the issue of process: just how does contact diminish prejudice? We test met... Recent years have witnessed a renewal of interest in intergroup contact theory. A meta-analysis of more than 500 studies established the theory's basic contention that intergroup contact typically reduces prejudices of many types. This paper addresses the issue of process: just how does contact diminish prejudice? We test meta-analytically the three most studied mediators: contact reduces prejudice by (1) enhancing knowledge about the outgroup, (2) reducing anxiety about intergroup contact, and (3) increasing empathy and perspective taking. Our tests reveal mediational effects for all three of these mediators. However, the mediational value of increased knowledge appears less strong than anxiety reduction and empathy. Limitations of the study and implications of the results are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

Intergroup anxiety (69%)69% related to the paper, Contact hypothesis (61%)61% related to the paper, Prejudice (51%)51% related to the paper, Empathy (50%)50% related to the paper
1,886 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/EJSP.2420150303
Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review.

Abstract:

Social desirability is one of the most common sources of bias affecting the validity of experimental and survey research findings. From a self-presentational perspective, social desirability can be regarded as the resultant of two separate factors: self-deception and other-deception. Two main modes of coping with social desir... Social desirability is one of the most common sources of bias affecting the validity of experimental and survey research findings. From a self-presentational perspective, social desirability can be regarded as the resultant of two separate factors: self-deception and other-deception. Two main modes of coping with social desirability bias are distinguished. The first mode comprises two methods aimed at the detection and measurement of social desirability bias: the use of social desirability scales, and the rating of item desirability. A second category comprises seven methods to prevent or reduce social desirability bias, including the use of forced-choice items, the randomized response technique, the bogus pipeline, self-administration of the questionnaire, the selection of interviewers, and the use of proxy subjects. Not one method was found to excel completely and under all conditions in coping with both other-deceptive and self-deceptive social desirability bias. A combination of prevention and detection methods offers the best choice available. read more read less

Topics:

Social desirability bias (74%)74% related to the paper, Response bias (56%)56% related to the paper
1,831 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/EJSP.2420180303
Notes towards a description of Social Representations
Serge Moscovici1

Abstract:

The theory of social representations occupies a place apart in social psychology both by the problems it raises and the scale of the phenomena with which it deals. This provokes many a criticism and misunderstanding. Such a theory may not correspond with the model of social psychology as it is defined at present. One attempts... The theory of social representations occupies a place apart in social psychology both by the problems it raises and the scale of the phenomena with which it deals. This provokes many a criticism and misunderstanding. Such a theory may not correspond with the model of social psychology as it is defined at present. One attempts however to show that it answers important social and scientific questions, in what it differs from the classical conception of collective representations and, from the very beginning, adopts a constructivist perspective which has spread in social psychology since. Several trends of research have confirmed its vision of the relations between social and cognitive phenomena, communication and thought. More detailed remarks aim at outlining the nature of social representations, their capacity to create information, their function which is to familiarize us with the strange, according to the categories of our culture. Going farther, one insists on the diversity of methodological approaches. If the experimental method is useful to understand how people should think, higher mental and social processes must be approached by different methods, including linguistic analysis and observation of how people think. No doubt, social representations have a relation with the more recent field of social cognition. But inasmuch as the former depend on content and context, i.e. subjectivity and sociability of people, they approach the phenomena differently from the latter. Referring to child psychology and anthropology, one can contend, despite appearances, that it is also a more scientific approach. There is however much to be learned from criticisms and there is still a long way to go before we arrive at a satisfactory theory of social thinking and communication. read more read less

Topics:

Social cognition (65%)65% related to the paper, Social philosophy (63%)63% related to the paper, Social change (63%)63% related to the paper, Social entropy (63%)63% related to the paper, Social network (63%)63% related to the paper
1,727 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/EJSP.2420250106
Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe
Thomas F. Pettigrew1, Roel W. Meertens2

Abstract:

This paper develops, measures, and tests two types of intergroup prejudice—blatant and subtle. Blatant prejudice is the traditional, often studied form; it is hot, close and direct. Subtle prejudice is the modern form; it is cool, distant and indirect. Using data from seven independent national samples from western Europe, we... This paper develops, measures, and tests two types of intergroup prejudice—blatant and subtle. Blatant prejudice is the traditional, often studied form; it is hot, close and direct. Subtle prejudice is the modern form; it is cool, distant and indirect. Using data from seven independent national samples from western Europe, we constructed 10-item scales in four languages to measure each of these varieties of prejudice. We report the properties, structure and correlates of both scales across the seven samples, and make initial checks on their validity. The cross-nationally consistent results support the value of the blatant-subtle distinction as two varieties of prejudice. While they share many correlates, their distinctive differences suggest better specification of these correlates of prejudice. And the blatant-subtle distinction also aids in more precise specification of the effects of prejudice on attitudes toward immigrants. The paper closes with a normative interpretation of Subtle Prejudice. read more read less

Topics:

Prejudice (legal term) (67%)67% related to the paper, Symbolic racism (54%)54% related to the paper, Integrated threat theory (51%)51% related to the paper
1,676 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for European Journal of Social Psychology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

European Journal of Social Psychology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write European Journal of Social Psychology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the European Journal of Social Psychology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the European Journal of Social Psychology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the European Journal of Social Psychology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in European Journal of Social Psychology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the European Journal of Social Psychology citation style.

4. Can I use the European Journal of Social Psychology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for European Journal of Social Psychology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in European Journal of Social Psychology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper European Journal of Social Psychology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in European Journal of Social Psychology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in European Journal of Social Psychology.

7. Where can I find the template for the European Journal of Social Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Journal of Social Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the European Journal of Social Psychology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. European Journal of Social Psychology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's European Journal of Social Psychology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like European Journal of Social Psychology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like European Journal of Social Psychology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using European Journal of Social Psychology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in European Journal of Social Psychology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is European Journal of Social Psychology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for European Journal of Social Psychology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for European Journal of Social Psychology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In European Journal of Social Psychology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for European Journal of Social Psychology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the European Journal of Social Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Journal of Social Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download European Journal of Social Psychology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in European Journal of Social Psychology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to European Journal of Social Psychology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template