scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Yamaguchi University

EducationYamaguchi, Japan
About: Yamaguchi University is a education organization based out in Yamaguchi, Japan. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 14804 authors who have published 25302 publications receiving 461740 citations. The organization is also known as: Yamaguchi Daigaku & Yamaguchi daigaku.
Topics: Cancer, Population, Membrane, Gene, Catalysis


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Kotb Abdelmohsen2, Akihisa Abe3, Joynal Abedin4  +2519 moreInstitutions (695)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macro-autophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

5,187 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Testing the hypothesis that long-term use of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) is effective for prevention of major coronary events in hypercholesterolaemic patients in Japan who consume a large amount of fish found it to be a promising treatment.

2,269 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A genome-wide association study to null virological response (NVR) in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 within a Japanese population is reported.
Abstract: Masashi Mizokami and colleagues report a genome-wide association study to hepatitis C treatment response in two Japanese cohorts. They report common variants at IL28B associated with sustained as well as null virologic response following pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin combined therapy.

2,097 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Franck Pagès, Bernhard Mlecnik, Florence Marliot, Gabriela Bindea1, Gabriela Bindea2, Gabriela Bindea3, Fang Shu Ou4, Carlo Bifulco5, Alessandro Lugli6, Inti Zlobec6, Tilman T. Rau6, Martin D. Berger7, Iris D. Nagtegaal8, Elisa Vink-Börger8, Arndt Hartmann9, Carol Geppert9, Julie Kolwelter9, Susanne Merkel, Robert Grützmann, Marc Van den Eynde10, Anne Jouret-Mourin10, Alex Kartheuser10, Daniel Léonard10, Christophe Remue10, Julia Y. Wang11, Julia Y. Wang12, Prashant Bavi12, Michael H.A. Roehrl13, Michael H.A. Roehrl11, Michael H.A. Roehrl12, Pamela S. Ohashi11, Linh T. Nguyen11, Seong Jun Han11, Heather L. MacGregor11, Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari11, Bradly G. Wouters11, Giuseppe Masucci14, Emilia Andersson14, Eva Zavadova15, Michal Vocka15, Jan Spacek15, Lubos Petruzelka15, Bohuslav Konopasek15, Pavel Dundr15, Helena Skalova15, Kristyna Nemejcova15, Gerardo Botti, Fabiana Tatangelo, Paolo Delrio, Gennaro Ciliberto, Michele Maio, Luigi Laghi16, Fabio Grizzi16, Tessa Fredriksen3, Tessa Fredriksen1, Tessa Fredriksen2, Bénédicte Buttard3, Bénédicte Buttard1, Bénédicte Buttard2, Mihaela Angelova1, Mihaela Angelova3, Mihaela Angelova2, Angela Vasaturo1, Angela Vasaturo3, Angela Vasaturo2, Pauline Maby3, Pauline Maby2, Pauline Maby1, Sarah E. Church, Helen K. Angell, Lucie Lafontaine3, Lucie Lafontaine2, Lucie Lafontaine1, Daniela Bruni1, Daniela Bruni2, Daniela Bruni3, Carine El Sissy, Nacilla Haicheur, Amos Kirilovsky, Anne Berger, Christine Lagorce, Jeffrey P. Meyers4, Christopher Paustian5, Zipei Feng5, Carmen Ballesteros-Merino5, Jeroen R. Dijkstra8, Carlijn van de Water8, Shannon van Vliet8, Nikki Knijn8, Ana Maria Mușină, Dragos Viorel Scripcariu, Boryana Popivanova17, Mingli Xu17, Tomonobu Fujita17, Shoichi Hazama18, Nobuaki Suzuki18, Hiroaki Nagano18, Kiyotaka Okuno19, Toshihiko Torigoe20, Noriyuki Sato20, Tomohisa Furuhata20, Ichiro Takemasa20, Kyogo Itoh21, P. Patel, Hemangini H. Vora, Birva Shah, Jayendrakumar B. Patel, Kruti N. Rajvik, Shashank J. Pandya, Shilin N. Shukla, Yili Wang22, Guanjun Zhang22, Yutaka Kawakami17, Francesco M. Marincola23, Paolo A. Ascierto, Daniel J. Sargent4, Bernard A. Fox5, Bernard A. Fox24, Jérôme Galon2, Jérôme Galon3, Jérôme Galon1 
TL;DR: The immunoscore provides a reliable estimate of the risk of recurrence in patients with colon cancer and supports the implementation of the consensus Immunoscore as a new component of a TNM-Immune classification of cancer.

1,326 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations


Authors

Showing all 14843 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Mien Chie Hung14175471633
Ko Okumura134105767530
Richard M. Ransohoff12749067439
Tony L. Yaksh12380660898
Toshikazu Nakamura12173251374
Xuan Zhang119153065398
Richard J. Simpson11385059378
Milton H. Saier11170754496
Theresa L. Whiteside10858836933
Amos Marc Bairoch9622274599
Pierre-Edouard Fournier9075830372
Satoru Miyano8481138723
Hiromi Rakugi8065725375
Yoshitomo Oka7730420519
Tatsutoshi Nakahata7746624761
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Hiroshima University
69.2K papers, 1.4M citations

92% related

Hokkaido University
115.4K papers, 2.6M citations

92% related

Nagoya University
128.2K papers, 3.2M citations

91% related

Kyoto University
217.2K papers, 6.5M citations

91% related

University of Tsukuba
79.4K papers, 1.9M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202318
202263
2021948
2020912
2019804
2018849