Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format
Recent searches

Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format Example of Applied Psycholinguistics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Applied Psycholinguistics — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Language and Linguistics #87 of 879 down down by 66 ranks
Linguistics and Language #98 of 935 down down by 71 ranks
Psychology (all) #85 of 203 down down by 45 ranks
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology #84 of 148 down down by 39 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 215 Published Papers | 542 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 24/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Cambridge University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 1.063
SNIP: 1.298
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.478
SNIP: 0.623

De Gruyter

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.43
SNIP: 1.013
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.2
SJR: 1.113
SNIP: 1.241

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.412

20% from 2018

Impact factor for Applied Psycholinguistics from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.412
2018 1.76
2017 1.836
2016 1.97
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.5

17% from 2019

CiteRatio for Applied Psycholinguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.5
2019 3.0
2018 3.5
2017 4.0
2016 3.7
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 20% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.988

7% from 2019

SJR for Applied Psycholinguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.988
2019 1.058
2018 0.938
2017 0.945
2016 1.018
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.054

22% from 2019

SNIP for Applied Psycholinguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.054
2019 1.344
2018 1.345
2017 1.461
2016 1.268
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 22% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Applied Psycholinguistics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Cambridge University Press

Applied Psycholinguistics

Applied Psycholinguistics publishes original research papers on the psychological processes involved in language. It examines language development , language use and language disorders in adults and children with a particular emphasis on cross-language studies. The journal gat...... Read More

Language and Linguistics

Linguistics and Language

General Psychology

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
23 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0142-7164
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.267
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G E Blonder, M Tinkham, and T M Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0142716406060024
Grammatical Processing in Language Learners.
Harald Clahsen1, Claudia Felser1

Abstract:

The ability to process the linguistic input in real time is crucial for successfully acquiring a language, and yet little is known about how language learners comprehend or produce language in real time. Against this background, we have conducted a detailed study of grammatical processing in language learners using experiment... The ability to process the linguistic input in real time is crucial for successfully acquiring a language, and yet little is known about how language learners comprehend or produce language in real time. Against this background, we have conducted a detailed study of grammatical processing in language learners using experimental psycholinguistic techniques and comparing different populations (mature native speakers, child first language [L1] and adult second language [L2] learners) as well as different domains of language (morphology and syntax). This article presents an overview of the results from this project and of other previous studies, with the aim of explaining how grammatical processing in language learners differs from that of mature native speakers. For child L1 processing, we will argue for a continuity hypothesis claiming that the child's parsing mechanism is basically the same as that of mature speakers and does not change over time. Instead, empirical differences between child and mature speaker's processing can be explained by other factors such as the child's limited working memory capacity and by less efficient lexical retrieval. In nonnative (adult L2) language processing, some striking differences to native speakers were observed in the domain of sentence processing. Adult learners are guided by lexical–semantic cues during parsing in the same way as native speakers, but less so by syntactic information. We suggest that the observed L1/L2 differences can be explained by assuming that the syntactic representations adult L2 learners compute during comprehension are shallower and less detailed than those of native speakers. read more read less

Topics:

First language (61%)61% related to the paper, Language acquisition (58%)58% related to the paper, Psycholinguistics (57%)57% related to the paper, Grammaticalization (55%)55% related to the paper, Grammar (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
928 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0142716406060383
Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship.
Susan E. Gathercole1

Abstract:

This article presents a theoretical framework designed to accommodate core evidence that the abilities to repeat nonwords and to learn the phonological forms of new words are closely linked. Basic findings relating nonword repetition and word learning both in typical samples of children and adults and in individuals with diso... This article presents a theoretical framework designed to accommodate core evidence that the abilities to repeat nonwords and to learn the phonological forms of new words are closely linked. Basic findings relating nonword repetition and word learning both in typical samples of children and adults and in individuals with disorders of language learning are described. The theoretical analysis of this evidence is organized around the following claims: first, that nonword repetition and word learning both rely on phonological storage; second, that they are both multiply determined, constrained also by auditory, phonological, and speech–motor output processes; third, that a phonological storage deficit alone may not be sufficient to impair language learning to a substantial degree. It is concluded that word learning mediated by temporary phonological storage is a primitive learning mechanism that is particularly important in the early stages of acquiring a language, but remains available to support word learning across the life span. read more read less

Topics:

Phonological awareness (64%)64% related to the paper, Verbal learning (60%)60% related to the paper, Vocabulary development (53%)53% related to the paper, Repetition (rhetorical device) (53%)53% related to the paper, Language acquisition (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
824 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0142716400010122
Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system
Heinz Wimmer1

Abstract:

The present study assessed reading difficulties and cognitive impairments of German-speaking dyslexic children at grade levels 2, 3, and 4. It was found that German dyslexic children suffered from a pervasive speed deficit for all types of reading tasks, including text, high frequency words, and pseudowords, but at the same t... The present study assessed reading difficulties and cognitive impairments of German-speaking dyslexic children at grade levels 2, 3, and 4. It was found that German dyslexic children suffered from a pervasive speed deficit for all types of reading tasks, including text, high frequency words, and pseudowords, but at the same time showed generally rather high reading accuracy. For pseudowords, reading refusals or word responses were absent, and the majority of errors was close to the target pronunciation. Reading speed seemed to be most impaired for pseudowords and function words that did not allow the children to take a short-cut from phonemically mediated word processing. The discussion offers a developmental framework for the interpretation of these reading difficulties. For the cognitive tasks, dyslexic children did not differ from age-matched control children on the pseudoword repetition task or the digit span task, indicating that auditory perception and memory were not impaired. On phonological awareness tasks (rhyme oddity detection, vowel substitution, and pseudoword spelling), dyslexic children scored lower than age-matched control children, but not lower than younger reading-level control children. The performance of the dyslexic children on the phonemic segmentation tasks (pseudoword spelling and vowel substitution) was high in absolute terms. In contrast, marked differences between dyslexic and age-matched controls were found on rapid naming tasks: dyslexic grade 4 children showed lower numeral-naming speed than reading-level grade 2 children. Numeral-naming speed turned out to be the most important predictor of reading speed differences. These findings are discussed in relation to the phonological impairment explanation of dyslexia and to recent alternative explanations that posit an underlying impairment in automatizing skills which demand the fast execution of low-level cognitive processes. read more read less

Topics:

Rapid automatized naming (59%)59% related to the paper, Dyslexia (59%)59% related to the paper, Phonological awareness (56%)56% related to the paper, Word processing (54%)54% related to the paper, Pseudoword (54%)54% related to the paper
687 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0142716400009863
The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants
Barbara Zurer Pearson1, Sylvia C. Fernández1, Vanessa Lewedeg1, D. Kimbrough Oller1

Abstract:

The bilingual child is seen as a unique source of information about the relation between input and intake. The strength of the association between language exposure estimates and vocabulary learning was examined for 25 simultaneous bilingual infants (ages 8 to 30 months) with differing patterns of exposure to the languages be... The bilingual child is seen as a unique source of information about the relation between input and intake. The strength of the association between language exposure estimates and vocabulary learning was examined for 25 simultaneous bilingual infants (ages 8 to 30 months) with differing patterns of exposure to the languages being learned. Using the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories, standardized parent report forms in English and Spanish, the percentage of all words that were known in each language was calculated and then plotted against the estimates of language input (also in percentages). A significant correlation was found, r(25) = .82, p < .001. The correlation was also strong when examined pointby-point, even for children whose language environments changed by more than 2O"7o between observations, although it was not reliable at lower levels of exposure to Spanish. Especially for children with less input in the minority language, the factors which appeared to affect the strength of the association between input and amount learned in a language are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Vocabulary (54%)54% related to the paper, Associative learning (53%)53% related to the paper, Language development (51%)51% related to the paper, Minority language (51%)51% related to the paper, Vocabulary development (51%)51% related to the paper
660 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0142716404001110
Morphological awareness: Just "more phonological"? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development
S. Hélène Deacon1, John R. Kirby2

Abstract:

Given the morphophonemic nature of the English orthography, surprisingly few studies have examined the roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading. This 4-year longitudinal study (Grades 2–5) compared these two factors in three aspects of reading development: pseudoword reading, reading comprehension, and sin... Given the morphophonemic nature of the English orthography, surprisingly few studies have examined the roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading. This 4-year longitudinal study (Grades 2–5) compared these two factors in three aspects of reading development: pseudoword reading, reading comprehension, and single word reading. Morphological awareness contributed significantly to pseudoword reading and reading comprehension, after controlling prior measures of reading ability, verbal and nonverbal intelligence, and phonological awareness. This contribution was comparable to that of phonological awareness and remained 3 years after morphological awareness was assessed. In contrast, morphological awareness rarely contributed significantly to single word reading. We argue that these results provide evidence that morphological awareness has a wide-ranging role in reading development, one that extends beyond phonological awareness. read more read less

Topics:

Phonological awareness (77%)77% related to the paper, Reading (process) (59%)59% related to the paper, Reading comprehension (58%)58% related to the paper, Morphophonology (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
628 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Applied Psycholinguistics.

It automatically formats your research paper to Cambridge University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Applied Psycholinguistics format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Applied Psycholinguistics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Applied Psycholinguistics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Applied Psycholinguistics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Applied Psycholinguistics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Applied Psycholinguistics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Applied Psycholinguistics citation style.

4. Can I use the Applied Psycholinguistics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Applied Psycholinguistics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Applied Psycholinguistics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Applied Psycholinguistics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Applied Psycholinguistics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Applied Psycholinguistics.

7. Where can I find the template for the Applied Psycholinguistics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Applied Psycholinguistics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Applied Psycholinguistics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Applied Psycholinguistics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Applied Psycholinguistics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Applied Psycholinguistics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Applied Psycholinguistics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Applied Psycholinguistics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Applied Psycholinguistics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Applied Psycholinguistics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Applied Psycholinguistics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Applied Psycholinguistics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Applied Psycholinguistics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Applied Psycholinguistics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Applied Psycholinguistics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Applied Psycholinguistics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Applied Psycholinguistics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Applied Psycholinguistics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Applied Psycholinguistics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template