Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format
Recent searches

Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format Example of Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine #28 of 262 up up by 56 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 289 Published Papers | 1575 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 01/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.3
SJR: 1.287
SNIP: 2.109
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.811
SNIP: 1.877
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.4
SJR: 1.15
SNIP: 1.705
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.1
SJR: 1.212
SNIP: 1.695

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

5.4

10% from 2019

CiteRatio for Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.4
2019 4.9
2018 3.6
2017 2.7
2016 2.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.43

4% from 2019

SJR for Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.43
2019 1.37
2018 1.058
2017 0.892
2016 0.831
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.037

10% from 2019

SNIP for Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.037
2019 1.86
2018 1.378
2017 1.047
2016 0.919
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

The aim of this journal is to provide clear, readable, expert reviews of the most important original papers recently published in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. We accomplish this aim by appointing leaders in major musculoskeletal medicine?related areas to 1) select to...... Read More

Medicine

i
Last updated on
01 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1935-9748
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.924
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12178-008-9032-5
Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review

Abstract:

In Europe and the United States, there is an increasing prevalence of the use of autologous blood products to facilitate healing in a variety of applications. Recently, we have learned more about specific growth factors, which play a crucial role in the healing process. With that knowledge there is abundant enthusiasm in the ... In Europe and the United States, there is an increasing prevalence of the use of autologous blood products to facilitate healing in a variety of applications. Recently, we have learned more about specific growth factors, which play a crucial role in the healing process. With that knowledge there is abundant enthusiasm in the application of concentrated platelets, which release a supra-maximal quantity of these growth factors to stimulate recovery in non-healing injuries. For 20 years, the application of autologous PRP has been safely used and documented in many fields including; orthopedics, sports medicine, dentistry, ENT, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, urology, wound healing, cosmetic, cardiothoracic, and maxillofacial surgery. This article introduces the reader to PRP therapy and reviews the current literature on this emerging treatment modality. In summary, PRP provides a promising alternative to surgery by promoting safe and natural healing. However, there are few controlled trials, and mostly anecdotal or case reports. Additionally the sample sizes are frequently small, limiting the generalization of the findings. Recently, there is emerging literature on the beneficial effects of PRP for chronic non-healing tendon injuries including lateral epicondylitis and plantar fasciitis and cartilage degeneration (Mishra and Pavelko, The American Journal of Sports Medicine 10(10):1–5, 2006; Barrett and Erredge, Podiatry Today 17:37–42, 2004). However, as clinical use increases, more controlled studies are needed to further understand this treatment. read more read less

Topics:

Platelet-rich plasma (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
538 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12178-009-9052-9
A comprehensive review of hip labral tears
Megan M. Groh1, Joseph E. Herrera1

Abstract:

The hip labrum has many functions, including shock absorption, joint lubrication, pressure distribution, and aiding in stability, with damage to the labrum associated with osteoarthritis. The etiology of labral tears includes trauma, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), capsular laxity/hip hypermobility, dysplasia, and degener... The hip labrum has many functions, including shock absorption, joint lubrication, pressure distribution, and aiding in stability, with damage to the labrum associated with osteoarthritis. The etiology of labral tears includes trauma, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), capsular laxity/hip hypermobility, dysplasia, and degeneration. Labral tears present with anterior hip or groin pain, and less commonly buttock pain. Frequently, there are also mechanical symptoms including clicking, locking, and giving way. The most consistent physical examination finding is a positive anterior hip impingement test. Because of the vast differential diagnosis and the need for specialized diagnostic tools, labral tears frequently go undiagnosed during an extended period of time. Evaluation usually begins with plain radiographs to assess for dysplasia, degeneration, and other causes of pain. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography scans are unreliable for diagnosis, magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) is the diagnostic test of choice, with arthroscopy being the gold standard. Typically, treatment begins conservatively with relative rest and non-steroid anti-inflammatory agents, with physical therapy (PT) being controversial. Often, surgical treatment is necessary, which entails, arthroscopic debridement of labral tears and surgical repair of associated structural problems. read more read less

Topics:

Femoroacetabular impingement (65%)65% related to the paper, Arthroscopy (56%)56% related to the paper, Labrum (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
234 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12178-018-9527-7
Current Clinical Recommendations for Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Adrian D.K. Le1, Lawrence Enweze1, Malcolm R. DeBaun1, Jason L. Dragoo1

Abstract:

This review evaluates current clinical literature on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), including leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), in order to develop evidence-based recommendations for various musculoskeletal indications. Abundant high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for ... This review evaluates current clinical literature on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), including leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), in order to develop evidence-based recommendations for various musculoskeletal indications. Abundant high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for lateral epicondylitis and LP-PRP for osteoarthritis of the knee. Moderate high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for patellar tendinopathy and of PRP injection for plantar fasciitis and donor site pain in patellar tendon graft BTB ACL reconstruction. There is insufficient evidence to routinely recommend PRP for rotator cuff tendinopathy, osteoarthritis of the hip, or high ankle sprains. Current evidence demonstrates a lack of efficacy of PRP for Achilles tendinopathy, muscle injuries, acute fracture or nonunion, surgical augmentation in rotator cuff repair, Achilles tendon repair, and ACL reconstruction. PRP is a promising treatment for some musculoskeletal diseases; however, evidence of its efficacy has been highly variable depending on the specific indication. Additional high-quality clinical trials with longer follow-up will be critical in shaping our perspective of this treatment option. read more read less

Topics:

Tendinopathy (60%)60% related to the paper, Platelet-rich plasma (52%)52% related to the paper, Plantar fasciitis (51%)51% related to the paper
209 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12178-009-9053-8
Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches.
Chad D Cole1, Todd D. McCall1, Meic H. Schmidt1, Andrew T. Dailey1

Abstract:

The authors review and compare posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A review of the literature is performed wherein the history, indications for surgery, surgical procedures with their respective biomechanical advantages, potential complications, and grafting substances ... The authors review and compare posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A review of the literature is performed wherein the history, indications for surgery, surgical procedures with their respective biomechanical advantages, potential complications, and grafting substances are presented. Along with the technical advancements and improvements in grafting substances, the indications and use of PLIF and TLIF have increased. The rate of arthrodesis has been shown to increase given placement of bone graft along the weight-bearing axis. The fusion rate across the disc space is further enhanced with the placement of posterior pedicle screw–rod constructs and the application of an osteoinductive material. The chief advantages of the TLIF procedure compared with the PLIF procedure included a decrease in potential neurological injury, improvement in lordotic alignment given graft placement within the anterior column, and preservation of posterior column integrity through minimizing lamina, facet, and pars dissection. read more read less
View PDF
207 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12178-014-9218-Y
Mechanical, Anatomical, and Kinematic Axis in TKA: Concepts and Practical Applications

Abstract:

Successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has often been based on the restoration of the knee to neutral alignment postoperatively. Numerous reports have linked malaligned TKA components to increased wear, poor functional outcomes, and failure. There have been many different alignment philosophies and surgical techniques that ... Successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has often been based on the restoration of the knee to neutral alignment postoperatively. Numerous reports have linked malaligned TKA components to increased wear, poor functional outcomes, and failure. There have been many different alignment philosophies and surgical techniques that have been established to attain the goal of proper alignment, which includes such techniques as computerized navigation, and custom cutting guides. In addition, these methods could potentially have the added benefit of leading to improved functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. In this report, we have reviewed and analyzed recent reports concerning mechanical, anatomic, and kinematic axis/alignment schemes used in total knee arthroplasty. read more read less
View PDF
205 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine citation style.

4. Can I use the Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

7. Where can I find the template for the Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template