Example of Ecological Processes format
Recent searches

Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format Example of Ecological Processes format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Ecological Processes — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Ecology #116 of 400 up up by 79 ranks
Ecological Modeling #15 of 32 up up by 8 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 189 Published Papers | 638 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 26/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.9
SJR: 0.774
SNIP: 1.158
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.2
SJR: 1.039
SNIP: 1.058
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.881
SNIP: 1.256
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

PLOS

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.3
SJR: 2.628
SNIP: 1.713

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.4

21% from 2019

CiteRatio for Ecological Processes from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.4
2019 2.8
2018 2.0
2017 1.4
2016 5.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.681

8% from 2019

SJR for Ecological Processes from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.681
2019 0.63
2018 0.462
2017 0.402
2016 0.835
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.456

43% from 2019

SNIP for Ecological Processes from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.456
2019 1.015
2018 0.823
2017 0.688
2016 0.925
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 43% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Ecological Processes

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Ecological Processes

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Ecological Processes formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 617 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Landscape dynamics

i
Last updated on
26 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1606-8610
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
White faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/S13717-016-0063-3
Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review
Yi Fan1, Jiquan Chen1, Gabriela Shirkey1, Ranjeet John1, Susie Ruqun Wu1, Hogeun Park1, Changliang Shao1
22 Nov 2016 - Ecological processes

Abstract:

This review was developed to introduce the essential components and variants of structural equation modeling (SEM), synthesize the common issues in SEM applications, and share our views on SEM’s future in ecological research. We searched the Web of Science on SEM applications in ecological studies from 1999 through 2016 and s... This review was developed to introduce the essential components and variants of structural equation modeling (SEM), synthesize the common issues in SEM applications, and share our views on SEM’s future in ecological research. We searched the Web of Science on SEM applications in ecological studies from 1999 through 2016 and summarized the potential of SEMs, with a special focus on unexplored uses in ecology. We also analyzed and discussed the common issues with SEM applications in previous publications and presented our view for its future applications. We searched and found 146 relevant publications on SEM applications in ecological studies. We found that five SEM variants had not commenly been applied in ecology, including the latent growth curve model, Bayesian SEM, partial least square SEM, hierarchical SEM, and variable/model selection. We identified ten common issues in SEM applications including strength of causal assumption, specification of feedback loops, selection of models and variables, identification of models, methods of estimation, explanation of latent variables, selection of fit indices, report of results, estimation of sample size, and the fit of model. In previous ecological studies, measurements of latent variables, explanations of model parameters, and reports of key statistics were commonly overlooked, while several advanced uses of SEM had been ignored overall. With the increasing availability of data, the use of SEM holds immense potential for ecologists in the future. read more read less

Topics:

Structural equation modeling (51%)51% related to the paper, Latent variable (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
513 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/2192-1709-2-25
Fine-scale hydrologic modeling for regional landscape applications: the California Basin Characterization Model development and performance
Lorraine E. Flint1, Alan L. Flint1, James H. Thorne2, Ryan M Boynton2
31 Jul 2013 - Ecological processes

Abstract:

Resource managers need spatially explicit models of hydrologic response to changes in key climatic drivers across variable landscape conditions We demonstrate the utility of a Basin Characterization Model for California (CA-BCM) to integrate high-resolution data on physical watershed characteristics with historical or project... Resource managers need spatially explicit models of hydrologic response to changes in key climatic drivers across variable landscape conditions We demonstrate the utility of a Basin Characterization Model for California (CA-BCM) to integrate high-resolution data on physical watershed characteristics with historical or projected climate data to predict watershed-specific hydrologic responses The CA-BCM applies a monthly regional water-balance model to simulate hydrologic responses to climate at the spatial resolution of a 270-m grid The model has been calibrated using a total of 159 relatively unimpaired watersheds for the California region As a result of calibration, predicted basin discharge closely matches measured data for validation watersheds The CA-BCM recharge and runoff estimates, combined with estimates of snowpack and timing of snowmelt, provide a basis for assessing variations in water availability Another important output variable, climatic water deficit, integrates the combined effects of temperature and rainfall on site-specific soil moisture, a factor that plants may respond to more directly than air temperature and precipitation alone Model outputs are calculated for each grid cell, allowing results to be summarized for a variety of planning units including hillslopes, watersheds, ecoregions, or political boundaries The ability to confidently calculate hydrologic outputs at fine spatial scales provides a new suite of hydrologic predictor variables that can be used for a variety of purposes, such as projections of changes in water availability, environmental demand, or distribution of plants and habitats Here we present the framework of the CA-BCM model for the California hydrologic region, a test of model performance on 159 watersheds, summary results for the region for the 1981–2010 time period, and changes since the 1951–1980 time period read more read less

Topics:

Hydrological modelling (66%)66% related to the paper, Groundwater recharge (55%)55% related to the paper, Water balance (54%)54% related to the paper, Downscaling (53%)53% related to the paper, Snowmelt (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
210 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/2192-1709-1-2
Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecological modeling and analysis
Lorraine E. Flint1, Alan L. Flint1
10 Feb 2012 - Ecological processes

Abstract:

Evaluating the environmental impacts of climate change on water resources and biological components of the landscape is an integral part of hydrologic and ecological investigations, and the resultant land and resource management in the twenty-first century. Impacts of both climate and simulated hydrologic parameters on ecolog... Evaluating the environmental impacts of climate change on water resources and biological components of the landscape is an integral part of hydrologic and ecological investigations, and the resultant land and resource management in the twenty-first century. Impacts of both climate and simulated hydrologic parameters on ecological processes are relevant at scales that reflect the heterogeneity and complexity of landscapes. At present, simulations of climate change available from global climate models [GCMs] require downscaling for hydrologic or ecological applications. Using statistically downscaled future climate projections developed using constructed analogues, a methodology was developed to further downscale the projections spatially using a gradient-inverse-distance-squared approach for application to hydrologic modeling at 270-m spatial resolution. This paper illustrates a methodology to downscale and bias-correct national GCMs to subkilometer scales that are applicable to fine-scale environmental processes. Four scenarios were chosen to bracket the range of future emissions put forth by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Fine-scale applications of downscaled datasets of ecological and hydrologic correlations to variation in climate are illustrated. The methodology, which includes a sequence of rigorous analyses and calculations, is intended to reduce the addition of uncertainty to the climate data as a result of the downscaling while providing the fine-scale climate information necessary for ecological analyses. It results in new but consistent data sets for the US at 4 km, the southwest US at 270 m, and California at 90 m and illustrates the utility of fine-scale downscaling to analyses of ecological processes influenced by topographic complexity. read more read less

Topics:

Downscaling (68%)68% related to the paper, Hydrological modelling (58%)58% related to the paper, Climate change (55%)55% related to the paper, Ecosystem model (51%)51% related to the paper, Spatial ecology (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
185 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/2192-1709-1-6
C:N:P stoichiometry and nutrient limitation of the soil microbial biomass in a grazed grassland site under experimental P limitation or excess
Bryan S. Griffiths1, Annette Spilles2, Annette Spilles1, Michael Bonkowski2
21 Jun 2012 - Ecological processes

Abstract:

The availability of essential nutrients, such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), can feedback on soil carbon (C) and the soil microbial biomass. Natural cycles can be supplemented by agricultural fertiliser addition, and we determined whether the stoichiometry and nutrient limitation of the microbial biomass could be affecte... The availability of essential nutrients, such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), can feedback on soil carbon (C) and the soil microbial biomass. Natural cycles can be supplemented by agricultural fertiliser addition, and we determined whether the stoichiometry and nutrient limitation of the microbial biomass could be affected by an unbalanced nutrient supply. Samples were taken from a long-term trial (in effect since 1968) with annual applications of 0, 15 and 30 kg P ha−1 with constant N and potassium. Soil and microbial biomass CNP contents were measured and nutrient limitation assessed by substrate-induced respiration. Linear regression and discriminant analyses were used to identify the variables explaining nutrient limitation. Soil and biomass CNP increased with increasing P fertiliser, and there was a significant, positive, correlation between microbial biomass P and biomass C, apart from at the highest level of P fertilisation when the microbial biomass was over-saturated with P. The molar ratios of C:N:P in the microbial biomass remained constant (homeostatic) despite large changes in the soil nutrient ratios. Microbial growth was generally limited by C and N, except in soil with no added P when C and P were the main limiting nutrients. C, N and P, however, did not explain all the growth limitation on the soils with no added P. Increased soil C and N were probably due to increased net primary production. Our results confirm that C:N:P ratios within the microbial biomass were constrained (i.e. homeostatic) under near optimum soil conditions. Soils with no added P were characterised by strong microbial P limitation and soils under high P by over-saturation of microorganisms with P. Relative changes in biomass C:P can be indicative of nutrient limitation within a site. read more read less

Topics:

Biomass (53%)53% related to the paper, Nutrient (52%)52% related to the paper, Soil carbon (52%)52% related to the paper, Soil water (51%)51% related to the paper, Essential nutrient (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
180 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/S13717-018-0118-8
Farmers’ perception of climate change and adaptation strategies in the Dabus watershed, North-West Ethiopia
Paulos Asrat1, Belay Simane1
28 Jul 2018 - Ecological processes

Abstract:

This study is aimed at analyzing farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate change in the Dabus watershed. It is based on analysis of data collected from 734 randomly selected farm household heads substantiated with Focus Group Discussions and field observations. The study employed descriptive methods to assess farmers’ pe... This study is aimed at analyzing farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate change in the Dabus watershed. It is based on analysis of data collected from 734 randomly selected farm household heads substantiated with Focus Group Discussions and field observations. The study employed descriptive methods to assess farmers’ perception of climate change, local indicators of climate change and types of adaptation measures exercised to cope up with the risk of the change in climate. The study also employed the Heckman sample selection model to analyze the two-step process of adaptation to climate change which initially requires farmers’ perception that climate is changing prior to responding to the changes through adaptation measures. Based on the model result educational attainment, the age of the head of the household, the number of crop failures in the past, changes in temperature and precipitation significantly influenced farmers’ perception of climate change in wet lowland parts of the study area. In dry lowland condition, farming experience, climate information, duration of food shortage, and the number of crop failures experienced determined farmers’ perception of climate change. Farmers’ adaptation decision in both the wet and dry lowland conditions is influenced by household size, the gender of household head, cultivated land size, education, farm experience, non-farm income, income from livestock, climate information, extension advice, farm-home distance and number of parcels. However, the direction of influence and significance level of most of the explanatory variables vary between the two parts of the study area. In line with the results, any intervention that promotes the use of adaptation measures to climate change may account for location-specific factors that determine farmers' perception of climate change and adaptive responses thereof. read more read less

Topics:

Climate change (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
151 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Ecological Processes.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Ecological Processes in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Ecological Processes guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Ecological Processes guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Ecological Processes guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Ecological Processes?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Ecological Processes citation style.

4. Can I use the Ecological Processes templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Ecological Processes.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Ecological Processes that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Ecological Processes that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Ecological Processes?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Ecological Processes.

7. Where can I find the template for the Ecological Processes?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Ecological Processes's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Ecological Processes's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Ecological Processes an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Ecological Processes is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Ecological Processes?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Ecological Processes?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Ecological Processes?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Ecological Processes, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Ecological Processes's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Ecological Processes?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Ecological Processes. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Ecological Processes?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Ecological Processes are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Ecological Processes?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Ecological Processes's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Ecological Processes in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Ecological Processes Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Ecological Processes formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template