Example of Ichthyological Research format
Recent searches

Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format Example of Ichthyological Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Ichthyological Research — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #363 of 647 down down by 28 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Medium
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 195 Published Papers | 355 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 20/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Hindawi

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.429
SNIP: 1.331
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

PLOS

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.3
SJR: 2.628
SNIP: 1.713
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

PLOS

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.0
SJR: 3.587
SNIP: 1.457
open access Open Access

Cambridge University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.2
SJR: 0.785
SNIP: 1.061

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.657

33% from 2018

Impact factor for Ichthyological Research from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.657
2018 0.98
2017 0.765
2016 1.258
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.8

6% from 2019

CiteRatio for Ichthyological Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.8
2019 1.7
2018 1.6
2017 1.8
2016 1.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 33% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.493

7% from 2019

SJR for Ichthyological Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.493
2019 0.459
2018 0.498
2017 0.389
2016 0.485
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.114

36% from 2019

SNIP for Ichthyological Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.114
2019 0.821
2018 1.08
2017 0.765
2016 0.889
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 36% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Ichthyological Research

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Ichthyological Research

Ichthyological Research is an official journal of the Ichthyological Society of Japan and is published quarterly in January, April, July, and November. Ichthyological Research primarily publishes research papers on original work, either descriptive or experimental, that advanc...... Read More

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
20 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1341-8998
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.791
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM (1982) Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B 25(7):4515_x0015_ 4532, URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10228-006-0367-X
A molecular phylogeny of the groupers of the subfamily Epinephelinae (Serranidae) with a revised classification of the Epinephelini
Matthew T. Craig1, Philip A. Hastings1
24 Feb 2007 - Ichthyological Research

Abstract:

The phylogenetic relationships among the fishes in the perciform tribe Epinephelini (Serranidae) have long been poorly understood, in large part because of the numerous taxa that must be considered and the large, circumtropical distribution of the group. In this study, genetic data from two nuclear (Tmo-4C4 and histone H3) an... The phylogenetic relationships among the fishes in the perciform tribe Epinephelini (Serranidae) have long been poorly understood, in large part because of the numerous taxa that must be considered and the large, circumtropical distribution of the group. In this study, genetic data from two nuclear (Tmo-4C4 and histone H3) and two mitochondrial (16S and 12S) genes were gathered from 155 serranid and acanthomorph species as a means of developing a phylogenetic hypothesis using both maximum-likelihood and -parsimony criteria. The maximum-parsimony analysis recovered 675 most parsimonious trees of length 5703 steps (CI = 0.2523, HI = 0.7477, RI = 0.6582), and the maximum-likelihood analysis recovered 1 tree at −lnLikelihood = 28279.58341. These phylogenetic hypotheses are discussed in light of previous morphological evidence to evaluate the evolutionary history of the group and their implications for the currently recognized taxonomy. Our results question the monophyly of the Serranidae, as well as the genera Cephalopholis, Epinephelus, and Mycteroperca as currently defined. The Serranidae is monophyletic only with the exclusion of the genera Acanthistius and Niphon. We propose a revised classification of the tribe Epinephelini that reflects the hypothesized shared ancestry of the group and recognizes 11 genera: Alphestes, Cephalopholis, Dermatolepis, Epinephelus, Gonioplectrus, Hyporthodus (which is resurrected for 11 species of deep-bodied groupers), Mycteroperca (including 7 species heretofore allocated to Epinephelus), Plectropomus, Saloptia, Triso, and Variola. read more read less

Topics:

Hyporthodus (65%)65% related to the paper, Mycteroperca (65%)65% related to the paper, Cephalopholis (64%)64% related to the paper, Alphestes (63%)63% related to the paper, Dermatolepis (63%)63% related to the paper
225 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S102280300002
Food habits of fishes in a seagrass bed on a fringing coral reef at Iriomote Island, southern Japan
Yohei Nakamura1, Masahiro Horinouchi1, Tadaomi Nakai1, Mitsuhiko Sano
25 Feb 2003 - Ichthyological Research

Abstract:

To clarify the feeding habits of fishes in tropical seagrass beds on coral reefs, the gut contents of 53 fish species, collected in an Enhauls acoroides-dominated bed at Iriomote Island, southern Japan, were examined. Ontogenetic changes in food preference were recognized in 9 species, including lethrinids, mullids, pomacentr... To clarify the feeding habits of fishes in tropical seagrass beds on coral reefs, the gut contents of 53 fish species, collected in an Enhauls acoroides-dominated bed at Iriomote Island, southern Japan, were examined. Ontogenetic changes in food preference were recognized in 9 species, including lethrinids, mullids, pomacentrids, labrids, and scarids. Cluster analysis based on dietary overlaps showed that the seagrass fish assemblage comprised seven feeding guilds (small-crustacean, large-crustacean, plant, detritus, hard-shelled mollusc, fish, and planktonic-animal feeders). Of these, small-crustacean feeders were the most abundantly represented. On the other hand, planktonic-animal and hard-shelled mollusc feeders were each represented by only two species. Compared with previous studies on the feeding habits of temperate seagrass fishes, the present fish assemblage was characterized by larger species numbers of detritivores, herbivores, and piscivores and fewer planktonic-animal feeders. read more read less

Topics:

Coral reef (55%)55% related to the paper, Seagrass (54%)54% related to the paper, Detritivore (54%)54% related to the paper, Detritus (53%)53% related to the paper
131 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10228-008-0053-2
Trophic niches of thirteen damselfishes (Pomacentridae) at the Grand Récif of Toliara, Madagascar
Bruno Frederich1, Grégory Fabri1, Gilles Lepoint1, Pierre Vandewalle1, Eric Parmentier1
26 Jan 2009 - Ichthyological Research

Abstract:

The damselfishes, with more than 340 species, constitute one of the most important families that live in the coral reef environment. Most of our knowledge of reef-fish ecology is based on this family, but their trophic ecology is poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to determine the trophic niches of 13 sympatr... The damselfishes, with more than 340 species, constitute one of the most important families that live in the coral reef environment. Most of our knowledge of reef-fish ecology is based on this family, but their trophic ecology is poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to determine the trophic niches of 13 sympatric species of damselfishes by combining stable isotope (δ15N and δ13C) and stomach content analyses. Isotopic signatures reveal three main groups according to their foraging strategies: pelagic feeders (Abudefduf sexfasciatus, A. sparoides, A. vaigiensis, Chromis ternatensis, C. dimidiata, Dascyllus trimaculatus and Pomacentrus caeruleus), benthic feeders (Chrysiptera unimaculata, Plectroglyphidodon lacrymatus and Amphiprion akallopisos) and an intermediate group (D. aruanus, P. baenschi and P. trilineatus). Stomach contents reveal that planktonic copepods and filamentous algae mainly represent the diets of pelagic feeders and benthic feeders, respectively. The intermediate position of the third group resulted from a partitioning of small planktonic prey, small vagile invertebrates and filamentous algae. In this last feeding group, the presence of a wide range of δ13C values in P. trilineatus suggests a larger trophic niche width, related to diet-switching over time. Some general considerations about the feeding habits of damselfishes reveal that their choice of habitat on the reef and their behavior appear to be good predictors of diet in this group. Benthic (algae and/or small invertebrates) feeders appear to be solitary and defend a small territory on the bottom; zooplankton feeders remain in groups just above the reef, in the water column. read more read less

Topics:

Pomacentridae (57%)57% related to the paper, Trophic level (53%)53% related to the paper, Pelagic zone (53%)53% related to the paper, Dascyllus (53%)53% related to the paper, Abudefduf (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
102 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10228-012-0303-1
Haematological and serum protein profiles of Mugil cephalus: effect of two different habitats
Francesco Fazio1, Simona Marafioti1, Agata Torre1, Marilena Sanfilippo1, Michele Panzera1, Caterina Faggio1
25 Jan 2013 - Ichthyological Research

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of two different habitats, Faro Lake (group A) and Tyrrhenian Sea (group B), on the haematological and serum protein profiles of Mugil cephalus. Our results showed significant differences of white blood cells, total proteins, prealbumin, albumin and α-globulins between groups ... The aim of this study was to assess the influence of two different habitats, Faro Lake (group A) and Tyrrhenian Sea (group B), on the haematological and serum protein profiles of Mugil cephalus. Our results showed significant differences of white blood cells, total proteins, prealbumin, albumin and α-globulins between groups A and B. These findings suggest that changes in haematological and serum protein profiles are important indices in monitoring the effects of aquatic habitat changes, representing an adaptive physiological response to different habitats of M. cephalus. read more read less

Topics:

Mugil (54%)54% related to the paper, Water environment (52%)52% related to the paper
101 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF02678706
Why is grouper larval rearing difficult?: an approach from the development of the feeding apparatus in early stage larvae of the grouper,Epinephelus coioides
Hiroshi Kohno1, Riza Ordonio-Aguilar2, Riza Ordonio-Aguilar1, Atsushi Ohno1, Yasuhiko Taki1
01 Jun 1997 - Ichthyological Research

Abstract:

The osteological development of elements forming the oral cavity was examined in early stage larvae of the grouper,Epinephelus coioides, from hatching to 242.5 hours after hatching. By the time of initial mouth opening, at 54 hours after hatching, the fundamental elements, composed of the trabecula, some components of the low... The osteological development of elements forming the oral cavity was examined in early stage larvae of the grouper,Epinephelus coioides, from hatching to 242.5 hours after hatching. By the time of initial mouth opening, at 54 hours after hatching, the fundamental elements, composed of the trabecula, some components of the lower branchial and hyoid arches, the quadrate and symplectic-hyomandibular cartilages, maxilla and Meckel's cartilage, had appeared. No further elements were observed until 165 hours after initial mouth opening, except some components in the lower branchial arch and head region. The appearance of new elements and initial ossification of existing cartilage occurred thereafter, but all elements related to feeding either had not appeared or had not started ossifying until 188.5 hours after initial mouth opening. Based on the morphology and developmental modes of these elements, the feeding mode of grouper larvae was considered to be “sucking/grasping.” However, the appearance and ossification of elements occurred slowly, with no transitional phase from sucking to grasping modes of feeding being observed during the study; such delayed development of the feeding-related bony elements was considered to be a cause of the difficulty in rearing early stage grouper larvae. read more read less
94 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Ichthyological Research.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Ichthyological Research format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Ichthyological Research in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Ichthyological Research guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Ichthyological Research guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Ichthyological Research guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Ichthyological Research?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Ichthyological Research citation style.

4. Can I use the Ichthyological Research templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Ichthyological Research.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Ichthyological Research that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Ichthyological Research that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Ichthyological Research?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Ichthyological Research.

7. Where can I find the template for the Ichthyological Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Ichthyological Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Ichthyological Research's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Ichthyological Research an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Ichthyological Research is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Ichthyological Research?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Ichthyological Research?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Ichthyological Research?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Ichthyological Research, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Ichthyological Research's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Ichthyological Research?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Ichthyological Research. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Ichthyological Research?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Ichthyological Research are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Ichthyological Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Ichthyological Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Ichthyological Research in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Ichthyological Research Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Ichthyological Research formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template