Example of British Journal of Health Psychology format

Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace

This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.

Open Access

British Journal of Health Psychology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley

Your data will always be in your control. Learn more

Get started with a free account

— or sign up using email —

See how it works

Guideline source

Categories	Rank	Trend in last 3 yrs
Applied Psychology	#51 of 227	down by 18 ranks

Journal quality:

High

Last 4 years overview: 218 Published Papers | 1056 Citations

Indexed in: Scopus

Last updated: 10/06/2020

Related journals

Insights

General info

Related Journals

Open Access

Recommended

Media Psychology

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 5.3

SJR: 1.446

SNIP: 1.572

Open Access

Recommended

Philosophical Psychology

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 1.8

SJR: 0.699

SNIP: 1.341

Open Access

Recommended

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 21.5

SJR: 4.975

SNIP: 8.981

Open Access

Recommended

Work and Stress

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 7.7

SJR: 1.91

SNIP: 2.682

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.917

18% from 2018

Impact factor for British Journal of Health Psychology from 2016 - 2019
Year	Value
2019	2.917
2018	2.472
2017	2.706
2016	2.551

Graph view

4.8

14% from 2019

CiteRatio for British Journal of Health Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	4.8
2019	4.2
2018	4.8
2017	5.1
2016	5.8

Graph view

Insights

Impact factor of this journal has increased by 18% in last year.
This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.05

6% from 2019

SJR for British Journal of Health Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	1.05
2019	0.989
2018	1.22
2017	1.078
2016	1.03

Graph view

1.499

29% from 2019

SNIP for British Journal of Health Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	1.499
2019	1.164
2018	1.481
2017	1.493
2016	1.343

Graph view

Insights

SJR of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

SNIP of this journal has increased by 29% in last years.
This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

British Journal of Health Psychology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

British Journal of Health Psychology

The British Journal of Health Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of psychology related to health, health-related behaviour and illness across the lifespan including: psychosocial mediators of health-related behaviours; influence of emotion on health and health-related behaviours; psychosocial processes relevant to disease outcomes, psychological interventions in health and disease; emotional and behavioural responses to ill health, screening and medical procedures; and psychological aspects of prevention. Read Less

Medicine

Last updated on	10 Jun 2020
ISSN	1359-107X
Impact Factor	High - 1.28
Open Access	Yes
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy	Yellow
Plagiarism Check	Available via Turnitin
Endnote Style	Download Available
Bibliography Name	apa
Citation Type	Numbered [25]
Bibliography Example	Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Open access • Journal Article • DOI: 10.1348/135910709X466063 •

Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments.

Kristin E. Heron¹, Joshua M. Smyth¹ •

01 Feb 2010 - British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract:

Purpose Psychosocial and health behaviour treatments and therapies can be extended beyond traditional research or clinical settings by using mobile technology to deliver interventions to individuals as they go about their daily lives. These ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) are treatments that are provided to people ... Purpose Psychosocial and health behaviour treatments and therapies can be extended beyond traditional research or clinical settings by using mobile technology to deliver interventions to individuals as they go about their daily lives. These ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) are treatments that are provided to people during their everyday lives (i.e. in real time) and in natural settings (i.e. real world). The goal of the present review is to synthesize and critique mobile technology-based EMI aimed at improving health behaviours and psychological and physical symptoms. Methods Twenty-seven interventions using palmtop computers or mobile phones to deliver ambulatory treatment for smoking cessation, weight loss, anxiety, diabetes management, eating disorders, alcohol use, and healthy eating and physical activity were identified. Results There is evidence that EMI can be successfully delivered, are accepted by patients, and are efficacious for treating a variety of health behaviours and physical and psychological symptoms. Limitations of the existing literature were identified and recommendations and considerations for research design, sample characteristics, measurement, statistical analyses, and clinical implementation are discussed. Conclusions Mobile technology-based EMI can be effectively implemented as interventions for a variety of health behaviours and psychological and physical symptoms. Future research should integrate the assessment and intervention capabilities of mobile technology to create dynamically and individually tailored EMI that are ecologically sensitive. read more

Topics:

Psychological intervention (55%)55% related to the paper, Mobile technology (53%)53% related to the paper, Psychosocial (52%)52% related to the paper,

View PDF

1,130 Citations

Open access • Journal Article • DOI: 10.1348/135910710X485826 •

Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review

Alison Bish¹, Susan Michie¹ •

01 Nov 2010 - British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract:

Purpose A new strain of H1N1 influenza, also known as swine flu was confirmed in the UK in May 2009 and has spread to over 100 countries around the world causing the World Health Organization to declare a global flu pandemic. The primary objectives of this review are to identify the key demographic and attitudinal determinant... Purpose A new strain of H1N1 influenza, also known as swine flu was confirmed in the UK in May 2009 and has spread to over 100 countries around the world causing the World Health Organization to declare a global flu pandemic. The primary objectives of this review are to identify the key demographic and attitudinal determinants of three types of protective behaviour during a pandemic: preventive, avoidant, and management of illness behaviours, in order to describe conceptual frameworks in which to better understand these behaviours and to inform future communications and interventions in the current outbreak of swine flu and subsequent influenza pandemics. Methods Web of Science and PubMed databases were searched for references to papers on severe acute respiratory syndrome, avian influenza/flu, H5N1, swine influenza/flu, H1N1, and pandemics. Forward searching of the identified references was also carried out. In addition, references were gleaned from an expert panel of the Behaviour and Communications sub-group of the UK Scientific Pandemic Influenza Advisory Group. Papers were included if they reported associations between demographic factors, attitudes, and a behavioural measure (reported, intended, or actual behaviour). Results Twenty-six papers were identified that met the study inclusion criteria. The studies were of variable quality and most lacked an explicit theoretical framework. Most were cross-sectional in design and therefore not predictive over time. The research shows that there are demographic differences in behaviour: being older, female and more educated, or non-White, is associated with a higher chance of adopting the behaviours. There is evidence that greater levels of perceived susceptibility to and perceived severity of the diseases and greater belief in the effectiveness of recommended behaviours to protect against the disease are important predictors of behaviour. There is also evidence that greater levels of state anxiety and greater trust in authorities are associated with behaviour. Conclusions The findings from this review can be broadly explained by theories of health behaviour. However, theoretically driven prospective studies are required to further clarify the relationship between demographic factors, attitudes, and behaviour. The findings suggest that intervention studies and communication strategies should focus on particular demographic groups and on raising levels of perceived threat of the pandemic disease and belief in the effectiveness of measures designed to protect against it. read more

Topics:

Pandemic (59%)59% related to the paper, Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 (54%)54% related to the paper

View PDF

878 Citations

Open access • Journal Article • DOI: 10.1348/135910702169420 •

Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions

Sarah Milne¹, Sheina Orbell², •

01 May 2002 - British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract:

Objective: This study compared a motivational intervention based on protection motivation theory (PMT, Rogers, 1975, 1983) with the same motivational intervention augmented by a volitional intervention based on implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, 1993) Design: The study had a longitudinal design, involving three waves o... Objective: This study compared a motivational intervention based on protection motivation theory (PMT, Rogers, 1975, 1983) with the same motivational intervention augmented by a volitional intervention based on implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, 1993) Design: The study had a longitudinal design, involving three waves of data collection over a 2-week period, incorporating an experimental manipulation of PMT variables at Time 1 and a volitional, implementation intention intervention at Time 2 Method: Participants (N=248) were randomly allocated to a control group or one of two intervention groups Cognitions and exercise behaviour were measured at three time-points over a 2-week period Results: The motivational intervention significantly increased threat and coping appraisal and intentions to engage in exercise but did not bring about a significant increase in subsequent exercise behaviour In contrast, the combined protection motivation theory/implementation intention intervention had a dramatic effect on subsequent exercise behaviour Thisvolitional intervention did not influence behavioural intention or any other motivational variables Conclusions: It is concluded that supplementing PMT with implementation intentions strengthens the ability of the model to explain behaviour This has implications for health education programmes, which should aim to increase both participants' motivation and their volition read more

Topics:

Implementation intention (61%)61% related to the paper

View PDF

677 Citations

Open access • Journal Article • DOI: 10.1348/135910705X53155 •

A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale

Margaret A. Chesney¹, Torsten B. Neilands², •

01 Sep 2006 - British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract:

Stress and coping theory has provided a foundation for a wide range of descriptive studies of the stress process. There is less evidence for its utility as a foundation for coping interventions. One of the impediments of the translation of stress and coping theory into intervention has to do with well-documented problems with... Stress and coping theory has provided a foundation for a wide range of descriptive studies of the stress process. There is less evidence for its utility as a foundation for coping interventions. One of the impediments of the translation of stress and coping theory into intervention has to do with well-documented problems with the measurement of intervention-associated changes in coping (Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004). The present study describes a measure of coping self-efficacy (CSE), which provides an alternate approach to the measurement of coping for intervention studies. This measure focuses on changes in a person’s confidence in his or her ability to cope effectively, which, according to self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1997), is an important prerequisite to changing coping behaviour. Stress and coping theory defines stress as a person-environment relationship that is evaluated as personally significant and as exceeding a person’s resources for coping. This process is referred to as ‘primary appraisal’. Coping is defined as behavioural or cognitive efforts to manage situations that are appraised as stressful (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Coping involves both emotion-focused coping (i.e. responses that focus on managing emotional responses to stressful events), and problem-focused coping (i.e. responses that focus on changing problematic aspects of stressful events). The choice of coping strategy is influenced by the appraisal of options for coping, referred to in stress and coping theory as ‘secondary appraisal’ (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Secondary appraisal refers to the question, ‘What can I do?’ A key aspect of secondary appraisal is the judgment concerning the extent to which the individual can control the outcome of the situation. Self-efficacy contributes to this judgment, which in turn influences coping (see Park & Folkman, 1997 for review). Maladaptive coping (e.g. coping that fails to regulate distress or manage the underlying problem) occurs when people respond to uncontrollable stressors primarily with problem-focused coping strategies, or when people respond to controllable stressors primarily with emotion-focused coping strategies (Strentz & Auerbach, 1988; Vitaliano, DeWolfe, Maiuro, Russo, & Katon, 1990). Adaptive coping refers to situations in which there is a fit between the controllability of the stressful situation and the choice of coping strategy (i.e. emotion-focused versus problem-focused). When people obtain a ‘fit’ between stressful events and their coping strategies, they experience fewer psychological symptoms than when there is a lack of fit (Park, Folkman, & Bostrom, 2001). Cognitive behavioural interventions such as coping effectiveness training (CET; Chesney, Chambers, Taylor, & Johnson, 2003; Chesney, Chambers, Taylor, Johnson, & Folkman, 2003; Chesney, Folkman, & Chambers, 1996; Folkman & Chesney, 1995), which are based on social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1997) as well as stress and coping theory (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), strive to increase adaptive coping, and, by doing so, reduce psychological distress and improve well-being. Perceived self-efficacy, defined as a belief about one’s ability to perform a specific behaviour, is a pivotal component of social cognitive theory in that beliefs of personal efficacy determine the acquisition of knowledge on which skills are founded (Bandura, 1997). Thus, beliefs about one’s ability to perform specific coping behaviours, or CSE, would be expected to influence outcomes of interventions designed to improve coping. This concept is also relevant to stress and coping theory and the secondary appraisal of controllability. Part of secondary appraisal is the judgment that an outcome is controllable through coping; another part addresses the question of whether or not the individual believes he or she can carry out the requisite coping strategy. Beliefs about self-efficacy are not a general disposition; a high level of efficacy in one domain does not necessarily correlate with high levels of self-efficacy in other domains (DiClemente, 1986; Hofstetter, Sallis, & Hovell, 1990). To achieve predictive and explanatory power, measures of self-efficacy must be designed and tailored to the sphere of activity (Forsyth & Carey, 1998). For example, self-efficacy regarding diabetic self-care behaviours has been identified as a pivotal psychosocial variable in diabetes research (Glasgow & Osteen, 1992; Jenkins, 1995), with scores on self-efficacy significantly associated with self-care by diabetics in the areas of diet, exercise and blood glucose testing (Williams & Bond, 2002). Efficacy beliefs also predict adherence to habits that lower cardiovascular risk and prevent myocardial infarctions in persons with coronary heart disease (Ewart, 1992; Jensen, Banwart, Venhaus, Popkess-Vawter, & Perkins, 1993). These lines of clinical investigation each developed specialized efficacy scales. The current study is designed to assess the reliability and validity of the CSE scale, a 26-item measure of perceived self-efficacy for coping with challenges or threats. The original instrument was developed by the authors, in collaboration with Dr Albert Bandura of Stanford University, for use in two randomized clinical trials investigating the efficacy of a theory-based CET intervention in reducing psychological distress and increasing positive mood in persons coping with chronic illness. In this paper, we subjected the CSE scale items to focused analyses with the specific goal of deriving a psychometrically sound and reduced form of the scale for use in future research. Analyses included assessing construct validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA, respectively), assessing reliability through internal consistency coefficient alphas and test–retest correlations, and assessing concurrent and predictive validity through partial correlations and multiple regression analyses, respectively. read more

Topics:

Coping (psychology) (64%)64% related to the paper, Social cognitive theory (53%)53% related to the paper, Appraisal theory (51%)51% related to the paper,

View PDF

642 Citations

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1348/135910709X461752 •

What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Stefanie Ashford¹, Jemma Edmunds¹, •

01 May 2010 - British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract:

Purpose Increasing self-efficacy is an effective method to increase physical activity Despite this, the evidence concerning the most effective techniques to increase self-efficacy in physical activity interventions has not been systematically reviewed The aim of the present research is to systematically gather, and meta-analy... Purpose Increasing self-efficacy is an effective method to increase physical activity Despite this, the evidence concerning the most effective techniques to increase self-efficacy in physical activity interventions has not been systematically reviewed The aim of the present research is to systematically gather, and meta-analyse, intervention studies which aimed to increase self-efficacy for physical activity; to estimate the association between intervention techniques used, and change in self-efficacy achieved Methods A systematic database search was conducted for papers reporting lifestyle or recreational physical activity interventions Published intervention studies explicitly targeting self-efficacy in order to change physical activity behaviour in ‘healthy’ adults were eligible for inclusion Results The search strategy identified 27 unique physical activity intervention studies, with a total of 5,501 participants A significant, yet small, relationship between the interventions and changes in self-efficacy was found (mean d =016, p <001) Owing to significant heterogeneity, moderator analyses were conducted, examining the association of changes in self-efficacy with whether or not specific intervention techniques were used Interventions that included feedback on past or others' performance produced the highest levels of self-efficacy found in this review Vicarious experience was also associated with higher levels of self-efficacy Persuasion, graded mastery, and barrier identification were associated with lower levels of self-efficacy Conclusions This meta-analysis forms an evidence base for which psychological techniques are most effective in increasing self-efficacy for physical activity The results are presented in terms of recommendations for those developing interventions and directions for future research read more

Topics:

Psychological intervention (55%)55% related to the paper, Meta-analysis (51%)51% related to the paper

596 Citations

Also popular among researchers

“

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds

Choose a template

Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates

Import a MS-Word file or start fresh

It takes only few seconds to import

View and edit your final output

SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines

Submit directly or Download

Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for British Journal of Health Psychology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

Easy support from all your favorite tools

British Journal of Health Psychology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write British Journal of Health Psychology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the British Journal of Health Psychology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the British Journal of Health Psychology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the British Journal of Health Psychology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in British Journal of Health Psychology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the British Journal of Health Psychology citation style.

4. Can I use the British Journal of Health Psychology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for British Journal of Health Psychology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in British Journal of Health Psychology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper British Journal of Health Psychology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in British Journal of Health Psychology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in British Journal of Health Psychology.

7. Where can I find the template for the British Journal of Health Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per British Journal of Health Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the British Journal of Health Psychology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. British Journal of Health Psychology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's British Journal of Health Psychology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like British Journal of Health Psychology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like British Journal of Health Psychology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using British Journal of Health Psychology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in British Journal of Health Psychology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is British Journal of Health Psychology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for British Journal of Health Psychology?

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for British Journal of Health Psychology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour	Archiving policy
Green	Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue	Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow	Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White	Archiving not formally supported

FYI:

Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In British Journal of Health Psychology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for British Journal of Health Psychology are:.

S. No.	Citation Style Type
1.	Author Year
2.	Numbered
3.	Numbered (Superscripted)
4.	Author Year (Cited Pages)
5.	Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the British Journal of Health Psychology?

16. Can I download British Journal of Health Psychology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in British Journal of Health Psychology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to British Journal of Health Psychology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

“

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

”

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user

British Journal of Health Psychology — Template for authors

Related Journals

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

2.917

4.8

Insights

Insights

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

1.05

1.499

Insights

Insights

British Journal of Health Psychology

British Journal of Health Psychology

Top papers written in this journal

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

Freedom from formatting guidelines

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Frequently asked questions

Fast and reliable, built for complaince.

No word template required

Verifed journal formats

Trusted by academicians

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.